Using the address by which I am subscribed to discuss @df.o
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 19:48
To: LOffice Developers List (libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org)
Cc: 'discuss@documentfoundation.org'
Subject: Grant of Lic
>> The documentation on LO
>> BASIC is so sparse that I can't find anything about opening
>> spreadsheets. The LO help file promises documentation at
>> OpenOffice.org; but clicking that link takes me instead to
>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/BASIC_Guide, which
>> is a placeho
Hi Charles,
Charles Jenkins schrieb:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
thereof. And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One
(hereafter called B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for
expensive licenses for Micros
2013/3/7 Tony Pursell :
> On 7 March 2013 16:43, Charles Jenkins wrote:
>
>> This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
>> thereof. And also a plea for help.
>>
>> I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter
>> called B1) in order to eliminate
2013/3/7 Nino Novak :
> Am 07.03.2013 17:43, schrieb Charles Jenkins:
>
>
>> This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
>> thereof.
>
>
> Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice has evolved from OpenOffice.org (now
> Apache Open Office), which in turn is derived from StarOf
On 7 March 2013 16:43, Charles Jenkins wrote:
> This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
> thereof. And also a plea for help.
>
> I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter
> called B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for expensive li
Am 07.03.2013 17:43, schrieb Charles Jenkins:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation thereof.
Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice has evolved from OpenOffice.org
(now Apache Open Office), which in turn is derived from StarOffice.
So you in addition might wan
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation thereof.
And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter called
B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for expensive licenses for Microsoft
Excel.
B1 has a toolbar button t
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2013-03-06 16:05:
I have a patch which is written for LibreOffice. However,
I want to provide that patch to LO under both LGPLv3 AND ALv2.
Based *solely* on the fact that it is dual-licensed and
nothing else, is such a patch acceptable.
as our licensing page sta
For corporate entities, this is not optimal... they need legal to
sign off on any donations, and such a "single" donation is
much easier. If a donation is triple-licensed "mpl+alv2+lgpgv2"
would that be accepted by TDF?
On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am gonna
The 'problem' is that I've been approached by a number of
corp, gov't and non-profits who wish to contribute to LO
but want their donations to also be covered under the ALv2.
They have heard back that code under ALv2 will not be accepted
by TDF and LO and that patches must be under LGPLv3+MPL to
e
Hence my (and others) confusion...
It's a pretty easy question; at it's basic:
Would code provided under ALv2+MPL+LGPLv3 be acceptable
to TDF and LO?
On Mar 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> back from vacation I stumbled over this interesting thread and for
> whatever reaso
On 06.03.2013 15:25, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 03/06/2013 09:00 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2013 18:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
back from vacation I stumbled over this interesting thread and for
whatever reason my mail filter skipped Florian's answer.
But after asking if I missed a reply I was pointed on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/License_Policy which is an
interesting page to read.
Is it possible that this page
On 03/06/2013 09:00 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2013 18:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
It's an interesting discussion; but in the ab
Hi guys,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
> I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
> some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
It's an interesting discussion; but in the absence of any concrete
code, patches etc. it doesn't belong on the libreof
I know that there were reasons for the fork and I respect that. I was
wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to some basic level api
for 3rd party developers?
Probably not, but I think it's worth asking.
Fred
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Keith Curtis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:
On 03/06/2013 04:47 PM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 06.03.2013 15:25, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 03/06/2013 09:00 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2013 18:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some
On 05.03.2013 18:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi guys,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
It's an interesting discussion; but in the absence of any concrete
code, patc
19 matches
Mail list logo
