There are open software stacks with various CMS tools where you can combine
wiki, blog, forum, and FAQ functionality together. A community site could
have articles on the front end to help demonstate features, provide
tutorials, expose new templates and extensions, etc.
Users can provide comments
There are already OOo plugins that integrate OOo with Google Docs. They've
been around for years.
-- T. J.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Frank Esposito frankespos...@gmail.comwrote:
Will this ever happen with Libre Office?
Google Launches Plugin That Fuses Microsoft Office With Google
, T. J. Brumfield enderand...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is an open OOo bug that is over 5 years old.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
It seems that OOo developers felt this was an unnecessary feature.
However,
as users have commented in that bug report, the 32-bit
In all fairness, Android tablets could become a large emerging market, but
Windows is still by far the predominant market.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
Quoting e-letter:
In terms of priorities, making LO the default for mobile (e.g.
android) is more
platforms:
Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Next should be platforms of the future.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
Quoting T. J. Brumfield:
In all fairness, Android tablets could become a large emerging market, but
Windows is still by far the predominant market
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Benjamin Horst bho...@mac.com wrote:
I expect the iPad and upcoming Android tablets to become the dominant
computing platform in developing countries--they are cheaper and make a
simple upgrade path from the mobile phones that are the primary means of
internet
for
LibreOffice to pursue some of these lingering issues with tons of votes?
Should they try to create the features that the community obviously wants
that OOo is not providing?
-- T. J. Brumfield
I'm questioning my education
Rewind and what does it show?
Could be, the truth it becomes you
I'm a seed
and
reimplement them without the need to fire up a JVM?
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
Thanks!
-- T. J. Brumfield
I'm questioning my education
Rewind and what does it show?
Could be, the truth it becomes you
I'm a seed, wondering why it grows
be considerably less work than completely redesigning the UI
from scratch. That is more time that could be dedicated to improving the
project in other ways.
-- T. J. Brumfield
I'm questioning my education
Rewind and what does it show?
Could be, the truth it becomes you
I'm a seed, wondering why
I'm moving this into another thread. Jonathon suggested that LibO fails at
accesibility requirements. Doing a few quick Google searches, it seems that
OOo and thusly LibO uses the Java Accessibility API to enable the use of
screen readers and braille devices. This is primarily used for Windows.
The discussion of why companies should or can't migrate away from MS Office
or proprietary document formats is a bit off-topic. I'm also assuming most
of us have had this discussion at length before as well. I'm assuming if
you're on this list that you are in favor of open software and open
True. However, the good news is that the 2007 and 2010 formats are largely
similar and are XML based. The old formats were binary and kept changing.
Since the format isn't changing as much, and the new format is easier to
reverse-engineer, now is a good opportunity for OOo/LibO to catch up and
I think there is a difference between removing Java as a dependency needed
for out-of-the-box features, and blocking people from extending the
application with Java extensions. I think keeping the Java UNO bridge does
make sense, but users shouldn't need to fire up a JVM for basic/common
13 matches
Mail list logo
