Is it possible to allow Oracle to donate to Apache and then for TDF to go to
Apache and say Please let us have that?
Oracle are code-dumping because the community left them standing alone.
Oracle are acting as generous benefactors but may end up splitting the OS
community over this one. We do
Charles
I am sure it can be done where the tab usage is done as a general setup as
alot of the major browsers today use tabs.
From an end-user perspective, I think tabs would be a big success for
us. They are an obvious, immediate difference from our biggest
competitor and something
,
Christoph
Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 20:52 + schrieb Zaphod Feeblejocks:
Hi All,
Since v 2.4 (I think), OO set comments beside the text, in little call-out
bubbles. This is a good idea. LibO still
does it, as does Word.
However, when I print, the comments go (a) on a new page
Hi All,
Since v 2.4 (I think), OO set comments beside the text, in little call-out
bubbles. This is a good idea. LibO still
does it, as does Word.
However, when I print, the comments go (a) on a new page or (b) at the end of
the document, with line-numbers
printed by each one. This is not
Here's one for you marketing gurus - has anyone approached computer magazines
about
putting LibO on cover disks?
--
Zaphod
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list
On 8 Feb 2011 at 9:45, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 8 February 2011 09:18, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the TDF an NGO. If its based in the EU the organization can possibly get
a lot of funding from the EU itself.
Yes but probably not by the end of March!
The EU spend
1 - Port to a Web based interface (HTML5)
As I said before I really believe that on-premise solutions are going to
become irrelevant in some time, when Zoho, GoogleDocs, etc. are mature
In many cases, this will be true - but not all.
I have worked with many people in the
Well done one and all!
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
On 03/01/11 04:10, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Including the ability to write OOXML format is a political decision
driven by the Novell and Microsoft marketing agreement. User experience?
Ask that question of any user of older versions of Word after they
receive a .docx document and are unable to
On 3 Jan 2011 at 17:29, Michael Wheatland wrote:
Could addons be clearly signposted on the main page?
Could first-time users be taken to the addons page, so they know
functionality can be
extended?
Could addons be clearly posted in the menus?
Could the frequency of downloading
On 3 Jan 2011 at 14:12, sophie wrote:
Hi Zaphod,
On 01/01/2011 20:52, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
Did you know that anything running Linux in France is not a computer? The
outworking of
this is a skewed market in favour of MS operating systems, and therefore in
favour of MS
Hi Alex,
The current French government needs money, big time - the
mobile/embedded market is still fairly bouyant - what better way to
generate a revenue stream to fill the depleted coffers ? ;-)
How cynical!
You make them almost sound like the UK government, who put 5p onto the price of
a
Supporting OOXML Strict today would make LO not compatible with MS
Office, and users do want interoperability and not just standard compliance.
Anyone remember Netscape?
It supported the W3C standards, Internet Explorer did not. But, MS, through
Frontpage etc.,
flooded the market with
On 2 Jan 2011 at 9:59, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
I also agree that ANY write-to docx should be an add-on, and not part of
the vanilla release.
Hi Craig,
I have a concern about the Addons. In my 10+ years of using
OpenOffice/StarOffice, the
inclusion of addons was a great idea. However, the
The Go-oo homepage also says Going forward, the Go-oo project will be
discontinued in favor of LibreOffice. Does that mean that LibreOffice
is driven by Novell too?
I wouldn't put in that simple words. Actually, LibreOffice is open to
any developer, individual or company that whishes
Hi Sveinn,
Sure, but how about conservation and readability by future generations
(when there's no more Microsoft knowledge around and nobody knows
anymore how to decrypt all the nuances of.doc + .docx files) ?
Fair point.
But: most users do not care. Not exporting to Word will make it
Did you know that anything running Linux in France is not a computer? The
outworking of
this is a skewed market in favour of MS operating systems, and therefore in
favour of MS
applications. This DOES affect LibO.
From: http://tinyurl.com/33ynbv7
Microsoft apparently has quite a
Just a thought
Might the following message be useful the first time a user tries to save in
docx.
--
Caution: this format is only fully supported by MS Word since 2007. Saving in
this format
may not be suitable if you wish to share data with users of older versions of
Word or users
of
OOo has for a long time given an option of downloading the full OOo package
with or
without JRE.
Ubuntu gives the option of full package, or only key components (Writer, Calc,
etc).
To avoid bloat, what about a joint-hosted TDF/Moz/others site, giving an option
of:
From TDF:
- Writer
- Calc
+1
I also don't like the current names much either. IMHO, they don't sound very
good and they don't describe the apps well either. Calc makes the app
sound like it's an advanced calculator, not a spreadsheet app, Impress is
too generic, and Writer sounds like a specialized tool for writers. I
With regard to the original question: are there any surveys or data
that confirm that the names for Writer, Calc and Impress need to be
improved? (I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case for Impress;
I don't see a problem for the others.)
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
--
Personally I would like to see active discouragement of the use of
Times New Roman, Georgia, Verdana, Arial, Calibri, Cambia, etc. as
they are restricted to Microsoft product use only, resulting in
impossible verbatim compatibility.
My concern is this:
Several years ago I started using
22 matches
Mail list logo
