Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-18 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2013-02-13 12:05: as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: The good points, the bad points What can we do in the same way, what in a better way the next time? What is needed to get it better? A discussion may cause some

[board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi to all board members, as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: The good points, the bad points What can we do in the same way, what in a better way the next time? What is needed to get it better? A discussion may cause some budget thoughts, community handling,

Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello K-J, thanks for your email. You are right but I don't think it will be formal. However we must do it one way or another. Best, Charles. klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de a écrit : Hi to all board members, as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened:

Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Klaus, On 13/02/2013 12:59, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Klaus, [...] Sophie was coming up with a better timeline / set of deadlines for the marketing / organisational things around the release put together which (I hope) would help improve communication between teams and general