I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
From a user's perspective, it always seemed like the Java portions of OOo
were shoehorned in. Starting a JVM eats up unneccessary memory and takes
time. One of the most common complaints of OOo is that it is a bloated app
that
According to me, Libre Office is developed primary on C++ with GTK, just the
extensions are on Java.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, T. J. Brumfield enderand...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
From a user's perspective, it always seemed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 03:36 PM, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
For those that have accessibility requirements, the Java is mandatory.
OTOH, even with Java, LibO is not
+1 for getting rid of java.
2010/11/2 jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 03:36 PM, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
I'm not aware of?
For those that have
+1 for getting rid of java.
+2 for getting rid of java.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 08:25 PM, RGB ES wrote:
Agree. Java affect key components, not only extensions:
base needs java, and as consequence the bibliographic database too.
Is that Base as in the database engine, or Base as in the front end?
If the former,
