On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Gianluca Turconi
m...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
Technically speaking, it may be true, because users always ask for new
features, but when we're talking about open formats and document exchange,
it's quite different.
More often than not, the users are
Il 01/11/2010 23.51, Thorsten Behrens ha scritto:
b) OASIS, for very good practical reasons, only wants to standardize
what has been successfully implemented (by at least three
independent products, even) - so out of necessity, you'll need
implementations of not-yet-standardized
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
IMO, it isn't only a question about better defaults, but a real
turning point for LibO.
I'll try to clarify my point of view.
Let's say that by the time ODF 1.2 will be out, every feature
currently supported from LibO will be in ODF specification too. That
would
Hi,
Am 31.10.2010 11:40, schrieb Gianluca Turconi:
my question is rather simple: will LibO use in the future versions
(post 3.3) a ODF strict format or an extended one?
We are going to do the same as OOo did. Default would be ODF 1.2
extendend (to allow e.g. comments in Impress, additional
Ciao Gianluca,
I think your question would be better asked to the developers' mailing
list, but I will nonetheless try to answer it here:
- there is no extended ODF version, unless of course you refer to the
extended ODF format used in OpenOffice.org. This specific version
had been enabled
Thanks to you and André for your replies.
See below for further comments.
Il 31/10/2010 12.52, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
[...]
I think your question would be better asked to the developers' mailing
list, but I will nonetheless try to answer it here:
- there is no extended ODF version,
Gianluca,
Le Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:08:37 +0100,
Gianluca Turconi m...@letturefantastiche.com a écrit :
Thanks to you and André for your replies.
See below for further comments.
Il 31/10/2010 12.52, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
[...]
I think your question would be better asked to
