Re: [tdf-discuss] Mark an issue as "confirmed"

2011-07-07 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Regina, *; On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > > currently new issues are set to "new", so there is no indication, whether an > issue has been reviewed or not. > [...] > Do you think, that would be useful? I'd rather have the fdo-admins change the default to unconfirmed.

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mark an issue as "confirmed"

2011-07-07 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: Regina Henschel schrieb: Hi all, currently new issues are set to "new", so there is no indication, Hi, that would be no problem, but on the QA meeting in Essen we agreed to mark such New-Confirmed bug reports with a pseudo keyword CONFIRMED, please see

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mark an issue as "confirmed"

2011-07-07 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Regina Henschel schrieb: Hi all, currently new issues are set to "new", so there is no indication, Hi, that would be no problem, but on the QA meeting in Essen we agreed to mark such New-Confirmed bug reports with a pseudo keyword CONFIRMED, please see

[tdf-discuss] Mark an issue as "confirmed"

2011-07-07 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, currently new issues are set to "new", so there is no indication, whether an issue has been reviewed or not. I suggest to generate a dummy user libreoffice-confir...@lists.freedesktop.org QA-volunteers, who have confirmed an issue, would then assign it to this dummy user and others