I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way
ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches flying in
the dev list.
2: What would TDF do with the OpenOffice.org name
HI,
On 06/06/2011 22:20, Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
and we really have work to do on our next versions, believe me,
talking/reading is really time consuming
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time
I believe he is asking
Why would we want the code to begin with at this point.
at the time of the fork, we already had all the code that was in OOo up to
that point, now LO has added more code, cleaned up a lot of code, and has
the backing of several large Linux companies. So why at this point
On 06/06/2011 22:54, James Walker wrote:
I believe he is asking
I believe I was answering
Why would we want the code to begin with at this point.
there is no questioning right now because their is no 'would' and there
is no 'code'. So as I said, wait for the real to discuss the 'want' and
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the transfer of
OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way ahead
of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches
Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way
ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches flying in
the dev list.
2: What would TDF do with the
On 06/06/2011 06:32 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is
way ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches
flying in
