On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 00:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Isn't that what the goal is of this project to slowly eat away
> at Microsoft's majority market share?
it's not my goal - or at least it is not the goal - I would prefer to
work on delivering a very good tool to the user base. I would
Are you talking about in addition to having an installable version of LO?
On 1/3/11 1:26 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Google only converts to ODF, they use their own proprietary file format
natively, they don't use ODF natively and they don't have as much
functionality as LO. You c
Hello Jonathan,
Google only converts to ODF, they use their own proprietary file format
natively, they don't use ODF natively and they don't have as much
functionality as LO. You can use Google Docs with a Google account as you
can use MS Docs with a Facebook account.
Problems:
- None of them use
Jaime I believe on previous posts on this thread or another one that TDF
is working on getting Google to support the ODF format. why create
something that has already been done by Google?
On 1/3/11 12:54 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
As I said before, Cloud based Office Suites are becoming more ma
As I said before, Cloud based Office Suites are becoming more mature, I
think LO should start developing an HTML5 browser based office and ideally
integrate it with Zimbra!
It would be great to install LO locally and be able to share it through the
web to others from your computer without any furt
Zimbra is exactly what would push LO to be a serious threat to Microsoft
Office. Isn't that what the goal is of this project to slowly eat away
at Microsoft's majority market share?
On 1/2/11 10:00 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan A
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>> Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
>> program such as outlook.
>
> Well, I disagree, but there is no way to prove one of us is right, so...
>
>> There are one o