Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Non-removable extensions

2010-12-07 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hello Michael PLease consider removing all these undesired dictionaries and extensions. Actually, I agree with OOo project where we should keep LO as lean as possible and offload collateral delevelopments to extensions, which by the way is a very nice feature. Now with no intent to spark

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Non-removable extensions

2010-11-02 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:34:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote: The more interesting thing to me is - why would you want to remove the PDF Import ? or the Presenter Console ? Because I don't like that additional complexity in the UI? (Just an example) There are valid reasons why I would want to

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Non-removable extensions

2010-11-01 Thread Michel Gagnon
Le 2010-11-01 07:34, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi there, On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:53 -0400, Michel Gagnon wrote: however I cannot modify my installation to remove the PDF Import and Persenter Console. So - there are lots of parts of LibreOffice that cannot be removed easily; such as the

[tdf-discuss] Re: Non-removable extensions

2010-10-31 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-10-31 16:19, Mirek M. a écrit : 2010/10/31 Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net On Sun Oct 31 2010 09:51:03 GMT-0700 (PDT) fyva wrote: 30.10.2010 19:44, Andy Brown пишет: Who had the bright idea to require the non-removable extensions in LibreOffice? This, IMO, is totally uncalled

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Non-removable extensions

2010-10-31 Thread fyva
31.10.2010 18:32, Erich Christian пишет: They are not listed in the 'change' dialogue, there is a topic called extensions (de: Erweiterungen) which got an X by default. Set on true the installer 'copies new files' but the number of extensions doesn't change and the next time you call setup it is