Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 05/12/2011 Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: Whoever hit that trap: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/7271 might probably think scary where to post, and where not. Well, that specific message is probably not a good example, since in the end it was more useful to the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-02 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Regina, *, Am 30.11.2011 16:53 schrieb Regina Henschel: Friedrich Strohmaier schrieb: [..] No. This can happen if accidently a poster uses reply to all instead of reply-to-list, without trimming the posters address. I use Seamonkey and there I see nothing like reply-to-list, there is

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-02 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Florian, *, Am 30.11.2011 09:31 schrieb Florian Effenberger: NoOp wrote on 2011-11-30 05:02: [..] Better yet, try it on the dev list as this seems to be where the request is originating from. That change is already in effect on the dev list, but I think it's not comparable to other

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-12-02 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-02 18:42: The question is, where to go regarding communication style. reply-to mangling hereby is*one* thing to look at. just today, one of our admins replied again directly only to me. If I didn't spot this, and replied again to the list, the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-11-30 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, NoOp wrote on 2011-11-30 05:02: I disagree. The moderators list is active, you guys post there regularly - try it on yourselves before creating a why is this happening panic on this list? Keep in mind that this list is also used by general users: well, I don't want to disable the current

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-11-30 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi NoOp, *, Am 30.11.2011 04:50 schrieb NoOp: On 11/28/2011 08:23 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: [..] * make it easy for new and peripherally involved users to get replies to their casual E-mails without doing a long list of operations. Where by a long list of

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-11-30 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Friedrich, Friedrich Strohmaier schrieb: [..] No. This can happen if accidently a poster uses reply to all instead of reply-to-list, without trimming the posters address. I use Seamonkey and there I see nothing like reply-to-list, there is only (1)Antwort auf dieses Nachricht and

[tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-11-29 Thread NoOp
On 11/25/2011 02:19 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi, FYI: It was not me asking for that change, nor Friedrich, but I'd like to reply to this: NoOp wrote on 2011-11-25 23:11: Why not experiment with the moderators or test list instead? Why the discuss list? Because a real test can

[tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

2011-11-25 Thread NoOp
On 11/25/2011 02:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Regina Henschel wrote: All mailing lists I'm described to (and believe me that are a lot) behave in the way that a click on Antwort auf diese Nachricht replies to the list. So keep the documentfoundation.org lists to behave this way too. Only