Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread e-letter
On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs hwfa.gmanen...@gmail.com wrote: Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of the current status of LO vis à vis the new MS office document formats docx, xlsx etc. Here we go again: please explain why you can't afford to buy m$???

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-12-13 3:11 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote: On 13/12/2011 14:43, Harold Fuchs wrote: Can LO read/import these formats for *editing*? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them. Can LO write/export these formats? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Jean Milot
Hello, I would like to know if all these formats are associated with LO when we install it. I have installed the last version ( .deb on Ubuntu 10.04) and i have ods etc associated with LO but not .docx xls How i can make this association for all the users on my server ? Thanks for

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-14 Thread Olav Dahlum
On 14/12/11 10:21, e-letter wrote: On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs hwfa.gmanen...@gmail.com wrote: Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of the current status of LO vis à vis the new MS office document formats docx, xlsx etc. Here we go again: please

[tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-13 Thread Harold Fuchs
Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of the current status of LO vis à vis the new MS office document formats docx, xlsx etc. Can LO read/import these formats for *editing*? All of them? If not, which? Can LO write/export these formats? All of them? If

Re: [tdf-discuss] Status of .docX etc.

2011-12-13 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 13/12/2011 14:43, Harold Fuchs wrote: Can LO read/import these formats for *editing*? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them. Can LO write/export these formats? All of them? If not, which? Yes, all of them, although - given the immense complexity and the non standard nature of MS