Hi all,
Our EasyHacks page here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks
is quite a mess by now as we have so many of them. Also I dont think it
is very inviting to newcomers. An really important EasyHack -- that
does not even require elite programming skills would be to
Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@pt-global.com writes:
Thanks, I get by with PS2PDF but don't get the table of contents
working.
Yes, AFAIK postscript doesn't support that. If there's some tool that is
able to extract and add bookmark information to a PDF, you can try
generating the PDF directly
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
wrong decision.
Cheers!
Jaime
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 16:36, Peter Jentsch
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garzagar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
Although MS stopped free support for MS Office 2003 some time ago, its
use is still widespread. It would be a mistake for LibO to support the
ill-defined, shifting OOXML and deprecate MS 2003 support.
I might be wrong, but Peter was referring to MS
snip
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 09:30:31 AM Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I
On 26 March 2011 16:36, Peter Jentsch pj...@guineapics.de wrote:
IMHO I don't think drop office 2003 format is a good idea: a lot of
people around still use it. And while you can install the
compatibility pack, as you say on your PC, is not possible to force
others to install a program, so it can
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed to be done to improve it, and
considering the
Il 26/03/2011 20:09, Jonathan Hudson ha scritto:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed
On 3/26/11 8:35 PM, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
Sounds like a very reasonable proposal due to the fact that 2003 ML is
rarely used.
rarely??? I think is the most used in the world!!!
MS Office 2003 XML format has nothing to do with DOC, XLS and PPT. It is
a different format, based on XML,
11 matches
Mail list logo
