Hello everyone,
I've been aware of the following situation for a long time in the bug
report forum, but I thought it would improve over time. Since it
hasn't changed at all, I feel I have to blow the whistle on this.
As I have already written in a specific thread, here's the situation:
1)
Hello Jean-Christophe,
Your message would be more useful and read on our QA list...
Thanks,
Charles.
On 14 juillet 2014 09:10:15 CEST, jean-christophe manciot
actionmysti...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've been aware of the following situation for a long time in the bug
report forum,
Le 14/07/2014 09:10, jean-christophe manciot a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I've been aware of the following situation for a long time in the bug
report forum, but I thought it would improve over time. Since it
hasn't changed at all, I feel I have to blow the whistle on this.
As I have already
Hi,
just to quickly expand on that:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:35:43PM +0200, Sophie wrote:
I believe it is always possible for the checkers to trust the
reporters and follow the steps to reproduce on their own material
first; if they can't do that, they probably should ask
I also replied to this off list. We are consistent and that's good ;)
Ultimately, we're not going to change our workflow. It's up to a user to
report with clear steps and a simple test document - else it's just a
waste of our time. Glad we all think alike :-D
Best,
Joel
On 07/14/2014 05:38 PM,
