[tdf-discuss] Custom properties
Hi, I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom properties have gone. Why it is happening ? It was working fine with openoffice 3.2. Thanks, rise_mini -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Custom-properties-tp2951331p2951331.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Custom properties
Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:55 -0700 (PDT), rise_mini meenakshi.kanau...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom properties have gone. Are the custom properties only lost after exporting to .DOC or are they lost when you simply close the .ODT file? There is a bug for Writer not recognising the addition of custom properties as a file change: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32177: Bug 32177 - Writer does not perceive addition of custom document properties as a change for saving. Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Why it is happening ? It was working fine with openoffice 3.2. Thanks, rise_mini -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 www.docarch.be Twitter: @RabelaisA11y -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: Custom properties
Hi, I have created one document in LibreOffice Writer. It has some custom properties. Firstly I saved it with .odt format. Close and re-open. .odt format document has all the custom properties. Save as with .doc format. Before closing it has all the properties. Close and re-open .doc format document. All the custom properties are gone. Thanks, rise_mini On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Christophe Strobbe [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] ml-node+2951649-1549929746-400...@n3.nabble.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:55 -0700 (PDT), rise_mini [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2951649i=0 wrote: I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom properties have gone. Are the custom properties only lost after exporting to .DOC or are they lost when you simply close the .ODT file? There is a bug for Writer not recognising the addition of custom properties as a file change: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32177: Bug 32177 - Writer does not perceive addition of custom document properties as a change for saving. Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Why it is happening ? It was working fine with openoffice 3.2. Thanks, rise_mini -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 www.docarch.be Twitter: @RabelaisA11y -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2951649i=1 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Custom-properties-tp2951331p2951649.html To unsubscribe from Custom properties, click herehttp://nabble.documentfoundation.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=2951331code=bWVlbmFrc2hpLmthbmF1amlhQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwyOTUxMzMxfC0xMjc0MzM4NzA0. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Custom-properties-tp2951331p2951674.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: Custom properties
Hi, I am using LibreOffice 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 10.04. Same problem with calc and impress. Thanks, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Meenakshi Kanaujia meenakshi.kanau...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have created one document in LibreOffice Writer. It has some custom properties. Firstly I saved it with .odt format. Close and re-open. .odt format document has all the custom properties. Save as with .doc format. Before closing it has all the properties. Close and re-open .doc format document. All the custom properties are gone. Thanks, rise_mini On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Christophe Strobbe [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] ml-node+2951649-1549929746-400...@n3.nabble.comwrote: Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:55 -0700 (PDT), rise_mini [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2951649i=0 wrote: I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom properties have gone. Are the custom properties only lost after exporting to .DOC or are they lost when you simply close the .ODT file? There is a bug for Writer not recognising the addition of custom properties as a file change: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32177: Bug 32177 - Writer does not perceive addition of custom document properties as a change for saving. Best regards, Christophe Strobbe Why it is happening ? It was working fine with openoffice 3.2. Thanks, rise_mini -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 www.docarch.be Twitter: @RabelaisA11y -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2951649i=1 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Custom-properties-tp2951331p2951649.html To unsubscribe from Custom properties, click herehttp://nabble.documentfoundation.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=2951331code=bWVlbmFrc2hpLmthbmF1amlhQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwyOTUxMzMxfC0xMjc0MzM4NzA0. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Custom-properties-tp2951331p2951795.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
Le 17/05/11 12:49, plino a écrit : Hi plino, What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Nobody seems to know, or if they do, they are keeping wraps on it. The people still around on the openoffice.org lists are equally at a loss as to what is really going on. Oracle has just shutdown comms. On the German OOo discuss list, some people have been alluding to the fact that the lights are being switched off in Hamburg where the majority of OOo development took place, and I have noticed a distinct reduction of input from Oracle employees on the OOo lists for a while now, not a complete lack, but certainly a significant reduction bordering on the void. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
- Original Message From: Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com Le 17/05/11 12:49, plino a écrit : What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Nobody seems to know, or if they do, they are keeping wraps on it. The people still around on the openoffice.org lists are equally at a loss as to what is really going on. Oracle has just shutdown comms. On the German OOo discuss list, some people have been alluding to the fact that the lights are being switched off in Hamburg where the majority of OOo development took place, and I have noticed a distinct reduction of input from Oracle employees on the OOo lists for a while now, not a complete lack, but certainly a significant reduction bordering on the void. Not saying that this is related at all, but the timing was rather interesting on the whole situation. I was at a conference in late March where a presenter talked about OpenOffice and LibreOffice for business uses; a couple Oracle folks were there. Over the course of it, we ended up mentioning the Copyright Assignment issue and the LibreOffice would be able to get updates from OpenOffice but not vice versa as a result - at least those two employees were not aware of that issue. So, don't know what's happening, and not saying that's related at all, but it was just very interesting timing overall. Personally I hope Oracle doesn't drop the ball on it and that OpenOffice proper can become a true community lead project as I haven't yet seen anything from the leadership of TDF to give me confidence they are not doing the same thing they blamed Oracle for, just in a slightly different fashion. (Thus why I've been lurking more.) Ben -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
On 5/17/11 4:17 PM, BRM wrote: Personally I hope Oracle doesn't drop the ball on it and that OpenOffice proper can become a true community lead project as I haven't yet seen anything from the leadership of TDF to give me confidence they are not doing the same thing they blamed Oracle for, just in a slightly different fashion. (Thus why I've been lurking more.) Being a member of the Steering Committee of TDF, and having some problems in understanding the meaning of your sentence, may I ask you to be more specific on the same thing they blamed Oracle for? Thanks. -- Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation email italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org phone +39.348.5653829 - VoIP +39.02.320621813 skype italovignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
@Italo, since you are indeed a member of the SC, can you share with the community more information about the original topic, please? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OpenOffice-dead-and-burried-tp2951991p2952858.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenOffice dead and burried?
Hi Plino, plino wrote (17-05-11 12:49) [...] What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Probably it will not surprise you when I say that to me it looks best if activities are combined as much as possible, in some form. Anyway that is how I understand open source. But since all depends from how Oracle will handle the situation, I am as curious as you are on what is going to happen. Cor -- - http://nl.libreoffice.org - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation - -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
Keeping OO separate from LO is a good thing overall; more actors in the open source office software sector gives healthy competition (like Opera and Firefox for web browsers), innovation and shows m$ users the benefits of using a non-proprietary document format. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
On 05/17/2011 05:17 PM, plino wrote: @Italo, since you are indeed a member of the SC, can you share with the community more information about the original topic, please? Apart from reiterating that we see one community going forward, as we always did (when we originally invited Oracle to join TDF), we do not have more information than those available to all of you. Every other comment on the future of OOo would be a speculation. I can only add that Oracle fiscal year ends on May 31, and this is prolly a deadline for a second announcement about the future of OOo. I can also suggest to have a look at Oracle SEC filings, which are available on Oracle web site, and especially presentations to analysts and Forms 10-Q (2009 and 2010). These documents provide an insight on investments and product strategies, and might help in understanding. But, again, given the amount of informations available, any comment on the future of OOo would be a speculation. -- Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation email italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org phone +39.348.5653829 - VoIP +39.02.320621813 skype italovignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
