Perhaps Red Hat is a sponsor of Flatpak, but that does not put the
same level of Snap/Canonical as a commercial product. I think the
Flatpak project was more closely linked to GNOME long until
independence, but their comments do not respect that decision at all.
I can not find any information on
The text of the announcement has been extensively reviewed by a large
number of people, with different backgrounds (including, but but not
limited to, Red Hat) and has been approved as such. Flatpak release has
been backed by Red Hat, and the Flatpak packaging has been managed by Red
Hat.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Robert,
Thanks for doing this! I think we should host this on our infra. In any
case, I'll forward this to other mailing list that may reach active
contributors.
Cheers,
- --
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-founder, The Document Foundation,
Hello everyone. I think there has been an error in the reference made
in the article of Flatpak in the announcement of LibreOffice 5.2
(https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2016/08/03/libreoffice-5-2-fresh-released-for-windows-mac-os-and-gnulinux/)
As they mentioned that Flatpak is a product
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi *,
during a LO-community-meeting in 2014 we planned to create a community
map to find people living nearby. We created something in that way,
but it seems it had fallen asleep. Now I have published the map I
created on my own homepage:
