Hello.
I'm an humble and unskilled user, but here's my opinion:
- I personally think technologies like ActiveX are a double sword, they
help others to get attached to the Microsoft ecosystem. This technology
isn't an open standard and has potential security risks.
- I see this issue is taken
Hello.
I wanted to reply this email, because I was having some minor
usability issues about LibreOffice. Nothing too bad, but I wanted to
share it with the team.
I was helping my gf to do some university work, I installed her
LibreOffice because she was used to OpenOffice and no problems to it.
Anyway, I don´t consider PDF a proper OPEN standard, as it´s not
designed by a global consortium like OASIS.
What about designing a new file format for this purpose and being part
of OpenDocument? Some people said DjVu being accurate but lacking some
features (vectorial image support?).
I'm not
Hello.
I also think all office applications should use a common codebase for
reading and writing the files, instead competing on one that supports
certain file formats better than the rest. Think of it as something
similar to FFMPeg/Libav, that could be used by all FOSS Office or
reader
10. ...
11. Profit!
Are there plans to improve it? I've seen easier government bureaucracy
stuff than that...
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Charles Jenkins
cejperso...@tec-usa.com wrote:
M. Henri Day wrote:
Charles wrote:
Now that we can find Bug 38244 under the section for voting on
There are end users that care of freedom in a broad sense. I'm one of
them, using Linux-based systems since late 90s :)
And we aren't so few, because the number is growing and specially in
this worldwide economical crisis. You can see by objective stadistics
that the adoption of FOSS is bigger in
What? Are they spamming OpenOffice.org users with some marketing
campaign? Amazing, they must be desesperated...
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Joe Rotello joerote...@windowgroup.com wrote:
MEMO
Subject:: Receipt of Strange OpenOffice Email from a new universe
A lot of us past
I support (pun not intended) the idea. This list could be useful to
users of other software, including classic ones.
Imagine someone was a former Wordperfect (or even still being, there
are people using it under a DOS emulator like DOSbox) and want to get
used to this new software. Or maybe he
, timofonic timofonic a écrit :
I propose another idea: What about convert the file support of LibO
into a portable, resource efficient, well designed and multiplatform
library for all FOSS projects? I would imagine it like the WebKit of
document file formats, but governed in a less corporate
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 14/11/10 11:25, Mirek M. wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been meaning to write this e-mail for a while now, but haven't gotten
around to it until now -- I hope it's still relevant.
The Next Decade Manifesto and the
+5 too.
What about supporting more languages for extensions instead? Lua seems
interesting, there are other languages that couldbe supported too.
I think LibO should be completely functional with all the features
without the use of heavy dependencies like JVM.
Also I think LibO should
...@softcatala.org:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:39 AM, timofonic timofonic
timofo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I'm not sure what one of the two mailing lists suits best, so I reply
in both because it may have different topis on each thread.
Oracle's OpenOffice (oOO) is going to participate in the Libre
12 matches
Mail list logo
