Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 04/22/2011 05:33 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jon
Hamkinshamk...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
have a LibO spell checker
On 04/24/2011 01:36 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
I have said this a number of times, and that at least the English
version is sadly deficient in compound words, at least the one in OOo
3.11 which I am still using because I am reluctant to give up the
personal dictionary to which I have added
Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 04/24/2011 01:36 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
I have said this a number of times, and that at least the English
version is sadly deficient in compound words, at least the one in OOo
3.11 which I am still using because I am reluctant to give up the
personal dictionary to which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2011 03:40, Jon Hamkins wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
Actually, there are only about one million English words in English, and
You are right. That billion words is the size of the corpus
On 04/22/2011 05:33 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jon Hamkinshamk...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
have a LibO spell checker that contains each of
Hi *,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jon Hamkins hamk...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
have a LibO spell checker that contains each of those words.
Actually, there are only about one
On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
have a LibO spell checker that contains each of those words.
Actually, there are only about one million English words in English, and
that's including the 500,000 or so scientific
@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 11:16:58 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences,Please make your action today against it.
Hello Laszlo,
Le Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:42:10 +0200 (CEST),
Kürti Lászlókurti.las...@openskm.com a écrit :
Hi All
: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences,Please make your action today against it.
Hello Laszlo,
Le Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:42:10 +0200 (CEST),
Kürti László kurti.las...@openskm.com a écrit :
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 14:56, Mike Hall wrote:
long documents, I personally came across only 2 instances of genuine MSO bugs.
I guess it is a feature that when I used MSO 2010 with Win7, the mean
time till seeing the BSOD was under 100 seconds. I guess it is
MO? What about iWork? How
Come our document formats don't work with them.
Sent from my iPhone
On 06/04/2011, at 9:23 PM, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 14:56, Mike Hall wrote:
long documents, I personally came across only 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 21:23, Robert Derman wrote:
My prime example, the word list in the spell checker is PATHETIC!!!
It is fairly easy to toss out the built in spell checker, and replace it
with something that is more suitable for your organization's
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9215419/EC_enters_talks_with_Microsoft_for_new_licenses?taxonomyName=IT+in+GovernmenttaxonomyId=13
If this come true than we (LibreOffice an other FLOSS products) will be down
and out, buried by
Le 05/04/2011 09:42, Kürti László a écrit :
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9215419/EC_enters_talks_with_Microsoft_for_new_licenses?taxonomyName=IT+in+GovernmenttaxonomyId=13
If this come true than we (LibreOffice an other FLOSS
Hello Laszlo,
Le Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:42:10 +0200 (CEST),
Kürti László kurti.las...@openskm.com a écrit :
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
Le Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:53:47 +0200,
pierre choffardet pierre.choffar...@free.fr a écrit :
Le 05/04/2011 09:42, Kürti László a écrit :
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
The commission is committed to getting value for money and negotiates on
behalf of all the E.U. institutions, agencies and other bodies - 42 in all.
Representing such a large number allows us to drive costs down and we will
drive a hard bargain.
How hard a bargain can they drive when the vendor
Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your action today against it.
Hello Laszlo,
Le Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:42:10 +0200 (CEST),
Kürti László kurti.las...@openskm.com a écrit :
Hi All,
Sorry for this off topic but this is serious
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9215419
...@documentfoundation.org
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 11:16:58 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your action today against it.
Hello Laszlo,
Le Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:42:10 +0200 (CEST),
Kürti Lászlókurti.las
- Original Message -
From: Charles-H. Schulzcharles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 11:16:58 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your action today against
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László wrote:
Even with docx, xlsx format could be read and written by OO.o or LibO (or at
least a workaround can be find).
Laslo,
Don't get me wrong, I entirely agree with all your sentiments.
Unfortunately, in practice the description of the situation I gave will
, but please let yourself off the hook of MS FUDs.
:)
Laszlo
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hall mike.h...@onepoyle.net
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your
an intelligent way but first of all we must act.
Laszlo
- Original Message -
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 11:16:58 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences
the hook of MS FUDs.
:)
Laszlo
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hallmike.h...@onepoyle.net
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your action today against
. :)
Laszlo
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hallmike.h...@onepoyle.net
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences, Please make your action today against
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hallmike.h...@onepoyle.net
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences, Please make your action today against it.
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 18:12:34 PM +0100, Mike Hall
(mike.h...@onepoyle.net) wrote:
The main cost is not the licence, for which in any case large
organisations generally pay very little per desktop. It's user
support that is costly, ie overall cost of ownership.
Mike,
I have a question about
:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences,
Please make your action today against it.
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László wrote:
Even with docx, xlsx format could be read and written by OO.o or LibO (or
at least a workaround can be find).
Laslo
@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences,Please make your action today against it.
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László wrote:
Even with docx, xlsx format could be read and written by OO.o or
LibO (or at least
On 5 April 2011 20:17, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 18:12:34 PM +0100, Mike Hall
(mike.h...@onepoyle.net) wrote:
The main cost is not the licence, for which in any case large
organisations generally pay very little per desktop. It's user
support that is
On 5 April 2011 21:08, Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com wrote:
All.
I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects.
We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately.
I inter-react with an educational institution and others predominantly MO,
our business is mainly LO.
: Mike Hallmike.h...@onepoyle.net
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:21:03 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS
licences,Please make your action today against it.
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László wrote:
Even with docx, xlsx
Mike Hall wrote:
Charles,
I think an appreciation of this point is absolutely crucial to a
successful product, which is why I bang on about it. And I'm only
faithfully recording my own experience.
Unfortunately there is a difference in quality, which implicitly you
seem to recognise. Yes,
On 2011-04-06 07:19, Ercole Carpanetto wrote:
On 5 April 2011 21:08, Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com wrote:
All.
I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects.
We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately.
I inter-react with an educational institution and
Commitee enter talks with MS
licences,Please make your action today against it.
On 05/04/2011 12:11, Kürti László wrote:
Even with docx, xlsx format could be read and written by OO.o or
LibO (or at least a workaround can be find).
Laslo,
Don't get me wrong, I
35 matches
Mail list logo
