plino wrote:
One of the bugs I reported (which is now obsolete, but still there) caused
that a user would loose data ...
And the bug has been ignored since then (this was in
November 25th 2009)
Could you provide the OpenOffice.org issue number?
Honestly I can't understand how you can state
Issue 107217
It is obsolete because it referred to a problem concerning the number of
lines in a spreadsheet which has been increased since then (the current
version supports 2^20 lines instead of the traditional 2^16)
It is ignored because it is not closed.
Maybe it could still be fixed to
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:09 -0700, plino wrote:
In the spirit of Open Source it doesn't make any sense that a closed
source compiler is used.
I agree - at least; it should be possible to compile with MINGW, and
we're working on that. The big stumbling block, which is also a
Hi
Really - this discussion belongs on the developer list; and the person
who needs to be contributing is the one complaining :-) so - I greatly
welcome your contribution here: there is a lot to do, but it is quite
do-able, and I (and Fridrich + Jesus) would be happy to mentor anyone
In the spirit of Open Source it doesn't make any sense that a closed source
compiler is used.
This means that the script available to compile the Windows version,
requires you to either use the limited free version from Microsoft or to buy
a the full version from them...
Currently MinGW-W64 is
Op 31-10-2010 12:09, plino schreef:
In the spirit of Open Source it doesn't make any sense that a closed source
compiler is used.
Not any less sense than that a closed source OS is needed to run the
program...
This means that the script available to compile the Windows version,
requires you
@Simon, so therefore I should not use Open Source programs because I'm using
a closed source OS?
Don't you see how absurd it is to need to BUY a compiler to compile a FREE
program? Then what is the point if the source is open and I can modify it
but can't compile it because I can't afford the
Op 31-10-2010 15:20, plino schreef:
@Simon, so therefore I should not use Open Source programs because I'm using
a closed source OS?
When did I ever suggest such a thing?
Don't you see how absurd it is to need to BUY a compiler to compile a FREE
program?
If that were the case, I might, but it
Which is free (as in beer) for as long as Microsoft wishes. Plus it is no
longer updated and creating a script for VC 2010 requires changes. Finally,
the free VC version does not create x64 builds which I hope LO starts
producing since most (all?) modern CPUs are 64bit...
Last week I made the
plino wrote:
All the developers agree that we should use open source compilers, and
this will happen. But it's not ready for production yet, so probably
the next few versions for Windows will still be using the Microsoft
compilers. It depends on how many people volunteer to work on that.
Actually the trackers did work. Technically. But the people managing it
didn't.
One of the bugs I reported (which is now obsolete, but still there) caused
that a user would loose data without being warned. The bug was raised from
the usual P3 level to P2 (meaning it would have to be fixed before
11 matches
Mail list logo
