Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-tomangling

2011-12-01 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Harold Fuchs wrote on 2011-11-30 11:59:


I think the idea that a simple Reply should only go the OP is very poor:


I personally do agree...


Perhaps for expert groups like Dev, the idea *might* be OK but for the
lists designed for general support I really don't think it is sensible.


...and so I think we indeed should choose the lists where this applies 
to carefully.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-tomangling

2011-11-30 Thread Harold Fuchs


Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote in message 
news:4ed5e9fe.5040...@documentfoundation.org...

Hi,

NoOp wrote on 2011-11-30 05:02:

I disagree. The moderators list is active, you guys post there regularly
- try it on yourselves before creating a why is this happening panic
on this list? Keep in mind that this list is also used by general users:


well, I don't want to disable the current mangling at all - but if we want 
to evaluate the impact, I thought it make sense to do it on a larger list. 
A list with a few subscribers and basically no e-mails is not an ideal test 
object...


But now it looks like the mangling change will only be relevant for a few 
lists, indeed.



Better yet, try it on the dev list as this seems to be where the request
is originating from.


That change is already in effect on the dev list, but I think it's not 
comparable to other lists at LibO. :)


Florian



I think the idea that a simple Reply should only go the OP is very poor:
1. People will not be able to see whether or not a question has been 
answered, or if it has been answered well.
2. People who didn't ask the question might nevertheless be interested in 
[some aspect(s) of] the answer but they won't get it.
3. Many of the people who ask questions are not technically familiar with 
the intricacies of e-mail. Thus, if they have a follow up to an answer and 
just hit Reply (which they will because they don't know better), that 
follow up will *only* go to the person who responded to the original 
question instead of to the list.
4. In general the scheme will proliferate private conversations which is 
the exact opposite of the intention behind using a list.
5. If you want this sort of behaviour, use a *forum* where the questioner 
can subscribe to only his/her question threads


Perhaps for expert groups like Dev, the idea *might* be OK but for the 
lists designed for general support I really don't think it is sensible.


Harold Fuchs
London, England 




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted