if you had objection to contribute to Oracle under these terms you should
be just as reluctant to contribute anything under the Apache License.
Norbert
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RE-Re-tdf-discuss-RE-Proposal-to-join-Apache-OpenOffice-tp3023594p3025592
On 5 June 2011 09:19, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't you think that is a bit over-paranoid?
I don't think he is.
If OOo was so valuable how come they didn't actually sell it off to
someone
like IBM for real dollars?
How do I know that it did not happen?
Because such
On 4 Jun 2011, at 19:06, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
such as tax relief or just in case it *might* somehow become valuable.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 4 Jun 2011, at 19:06, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:12:59PM +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
I don't see how it is possible to take it all back Once licensed that code
and subsequent derivatives are not in their control. Just like LO can go on
developing as before. If they fork the project under their own new license,
yes
A reminder,about last line. In this particular case Oracle does not have
the copyrights about openoffice.
If they claim that now,they will have serious problems with other
companies for a lot of reasons...
Em 05/06/2011 16:06, Marvin Humphrey escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:12:59PM
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Consolidation of copyright in the hands of one entity enables unilateral
relicensing. We have all just seen that in action with Oracle's software
grant of the OO.o codebase under ALv2 to the ASF, but it was also in
In data 04 giugno 2011 alle ore 18:06:34, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org ha scritto:
Apologies for top posting, I'm on my phone. Perhaps did I get confused
for a
moment but I hear that Oracle will in fact retain the copyright on the
Openoffice codebase
I've read
Gianluca, Allen,
My doubt comes from the article in the Register and the Groklaw analysis.
Allen confirmed my suspicions. I understand, then, that contributing
anything now to openoffice means to contribute it to Oracle.
Best,
charles.
Le 4 juin 2011, 6:26 PM, Gianluca Turconi
In data 04 giugno 2011 alle ore 18:33:26, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org ha scritto:
My doubt comes from the article in the Register and the Groklaw analysis.
I'm reading the Groklaw article right now. is this
Yes.
Charles.
Le 4 juin 2011, 6:37 PM, Gianluca Turconi pub...@letturefantastiche.com a
écrit :
In data 04 giugno 2011 alle ore 18:33:26, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org ha scritto:
My doubt comes from the article in the Register and the Groklaw analysis.
I'm reading
On 4 June 2011 17:33, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Gianluca, Allen,
My doubt comes from the article in the Register and the Groklaw analysis.
Allen confirmed my suspicions. I understand, then, that contributing
anything now to openoffice means to contribute
2011/6/4 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
On 4 June 2011 17:33, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Gianluca, Allen,
My doubt comes from the article in the Register and the Groklaw analysis.
Allen confirmed my suspicions. I understand, then, that contributing
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
such as tax relief or just in case it *might* somehow become valuable.
Oracle offered to transfer the copyright, and
Hi *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
such as tax relief or just in case it
15 matches
Mail list logo
