John Resig schrieb:
>> I like the above (it actually reminds me of scriptaculous) -- but I
>> also like Klaus's chaining of .fadeTo() and .slideUp||Down(). Will the
>> chaining ever work? I have used it in some existing code.
>
> I'm confused as to what you're asking - the chaining works righ
> I like the above (it actually reminds me of scriptaculous) -- but I
> also like Klaus's chaining of .fadeTo() and .slideUp||Down(). Will the
> chaining ever work? I have used it in some existing code.
I'm confused as to what you're asking - the chaining works right now.
The "pre-compiled" ani
John Resig wrote:
> Well, you can roll your own custom animation, like so:
>
> $("#foo").animate({
> height: 'show',
> opacity: 'show'
> }, 'slow');
>
> The new .animate() function is incredibly flexible.
>
> --John
>
John,
I like the above (it actually reminds me of scriptaculous) -
Hi Kelvin,
As you've already made the calendar language configurable, it'd be
nice to be able to choose the start day for the weeks (nobody in Spain
would understand a Sunday based calendar).
Cheers.
--
Choan
On 8/16/06, Kelvin Luck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest version is here:
>
I think i'm confusing things here. In addition to using dashes in class
names and ids, I use them for custom property (attribute) names as
well. specifically because I like to make my non-xhtml properties stand
out, usually by prefixing them with the 'x-' prefix, similar to
non-standard mime
> > I actually use '-' myself, which doesn't conflict with CSS, but jQuery
> > still doesn't like them because of the attr() function translates
> > this-name into thisName.
>
> I always use '-' in my ids and classes. This is really bad. I think that
> should be fixed!
I'm really confused here - t
Stephen Howard schrieb:
> I actually use '-' myself, which doesn't conflict with CSS, but jQuery
> still doesn't like them because of the attr() function translates
> this-name into thisName.
I always use '-' in my ids and classes. This is really bad. I think that
should be fixed!
-- Klaus
John,
The svn version worked. Thanks for the help!
Brian
John Resig wrote:
> Brian -
>
> This was a bug that was fixed in the latest SVN version of jQuery:
> http://jquery.com/src/jquery-svn.js
>
> Try switching your code over to using that version of jQuery, because
> it should work (I test
> > > > From: Michael Geary
> > > > $("#daysheader").load( "ajax/weekview_headers.aspx?fromdate=" +
calendarDay.Date );
> > > > $("#days").load(
> > > > "ajax/weekview_appointments.aspx?fromdate=" + calendarDay.Date,
> > > > BindTimeSelectors()
> > > > );
> > > From: Klaus Hartl
> > >
Dave Methvin wrote:
>> Although this fixes the bug, it is confusing to me when we sometimes
>> need an "end" and sometimes not with the each() command.
>>
>
> That can't be the correct permanent fix, though; something else is messing
> up the object elsewhere. Looking at the $() constructor in
Brian -
> Thanks for taking the time, but the bottom-right image still doesn't
> change. It's weird because the left image works and the right doesn't.
This was a bug that was fixed in the latest SVN version of jQuery:
http://jquery.com/src/jquery-svn.js
Try switching your code over to using tha
> That can't be the correct permanent fix, though; something else is messing
> up the object elsewhere. Looking at the $() constructor in SVN I see this:
>
> // Watch for when a jQuery object is passed at the context
> if ( c && c.jquery ) return c.find(a);
>
> That would end up doi
> But is this still not in docs?
I guess I was expecting this method to be only used by Plugin
developers - but in reality, it makes sense for regular users to use
it too. I'll add it back in to the updated docs.
--John
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@
> Anyway, long story short, i changed this:
>a.push({name: n, value: this.value});
>});
> into
>a.push({name: n, value: this.value});
>}).end();
> Although this fixes the bug, it is confusing to me when we sometimes
> need an "end" and sometimes not with the each() command.
I actually use '-' myself, which doesn't conflict with CSS, but jQuery
still doesn't like them because of the attr() function translates
this-name into thisName.
I think we're all just stuck with using [A-Za-z0-9_] for attribute and
id names :)
-Stephen
John Resig wrote:
> Hehe - it seems lik
Thanks for taking the time, but the bottom-right image still doesn't
change. It's weird because the left image works and the right doesn't.
Brian
Karl Swedberg wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Brian Wilkins wrote:
>
>
> ...Try this instead:
> $("div#leftcol").css({background:"#fff
On 8/19/06, Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @John, please read since the "each" function could still contain a bug
> (see bottom 2 lines)
Thanks, Gilles. It works just fine with my form test. And thanks
John, for fixing bug #110!
Mike
_
Cl, I got it.But is this still not in docs?2006/8/19, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
John, could you please stop making jQuery better and better andbetter... ;-)John Resig rocked:> Well, you can roll your own custom animation, like so:>> $("#foo").animate({
> height: 'show',> opacity
This is a great idea, we could tweak John's tool for generating
scriptDocs and build it using ant.
Making it less complex, and sutible for documenting plugins.
/christian
- Meddelande från [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Datum: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:44:22 +0100
Från: Sam Collett <[EMAIL PR
@John, please read since the "each" function could still contain a bug
(see bottom 2 lines)
Hi guys,
I've just committed a bug fix to the form plugin. As you might have
seen, I noticed that i somehow got an fieldset element instead of a form
element in the $.fn.ajaxSubmit function. By doing a
Although " var div = $('.tableParent', xml).get(0);" works in FF, IE
gives error on this line of jQuery:
return new RegExp("(^|\\s)" + a + "(\\s|$)").test(e);
On 8/19/06, Mohsen Saboorian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi buddies,
> I have some problems running ajax in IE, the same code works great
John, could you please stop making jQuery better and better and
better... ;-)
John Resig rocked:
> Well, you can roll your own custom animation, like so:
>
> $("#foo").animate({
> height: 'show',
> opacity: 'show'
> }, 'slow');
>
> The new .animate() function is incredibly flexible.
Hi buddies,
I have some problems running ajax in IE, the same code works great in
mozilla firefox. my code is something like this :
$.ajax({
url: ''http://myUrl'),
type: "GET",
error: function() {alert('ee');},
success: function(http) {
On 19/08/06, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Picking and validating are separate operations. I know my birthday and can
> > type it faster than I can pick it. Pickers are useful when you know you want
> > a Friday in September but d
On 18/08/06, Stephen Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I had suggested returning an explicit false from your each
> function should short circuit. It was an easy add to the jquery source
> too, but I believe jq 1.0 is in feature freeze at the moment.
>
> -Stephen
>
I use return to continu
25 matches
Mail list logo
