Glen Lipka schrieb:
In http://jquery.com/api under PREV(), the examples say previous().
Fixed (soon in SVN) :-)
-- Jörn
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
If desired I would put it on the jQuery blog. Or add that to the
cookbook section. Or both - I'm all open...
Actually I added it to the Wiki already:
http://jquery.com/docs/ProgressiveEnhancement/
-- Jörn
___
jQuery mailing
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Ah, btw, I made a little error here. This is correct:
$('#hijax-me').submit(function() {
return false;
});
Ye gods! Updated the wiki entry :-)
-- Jörn
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
Hi,
today I wanted to add to the tabs plugin the possibility to define your
own animation for the tab switch.
Like:
$('#container-8').tabs({fxAnimate: [{height: 'show', opacity: 'show'},
{height: 'hide', opacity: 'hide'}]});
There is a strange bug although. It works on the first click, but
I am having issues with interface sortable and newer version of jqueryis this a known situation?Is there a solution?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Sam Sherlock schrieb:
I am having issues with interface sortable and newer version of jquery
is this a known situation?
Is there a solution?
Using Interface with jQuery 1.0.1 should not be a problem. If there is,
it would help if you report the exact problem.
If you use Interface with the
The recent increase in questions about form serialization and form
submission makes me wonder the following about why the form plugin is
not used more:
1. Is it not meeting your needs?
2. Did you not know it exists?
3. Do you prefer not to use plugins?
4. Something else?
I also wonder if its
My personal preference would be to move the form plugin methods into
core, remove core's existing serialize method and introduce a
serializeToString (or something like that) that has a string return
type in the form of name=valuename=value. All this would increase
the size of core, but only
Mike Alsup wrote:
The recent increase in questions about form serialization and form
submission makes me wonder the following about why the form plugin is
not used more:
2. Did you not know it exists?
This was the reason that I didn't use it in my most recent project. I've
since seen the
Mike Alsup schrieb:
My personal preference would be to move the form plugin methods into
core, remove core's existing serialize method and introduce a
serializeToString (or something like that) that has a string return
type in the form of name=valuename=value. All this would increase
the
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Hi,
today I wanted to add to the tabs plugin the possibility to define your
own animation for the tab switch.
Like:
$('#container-8').tabs({fxAnimate: [{height: 'show', opacity: 'show'},
{height: 'hide', opacity: 'hide'}]});
There is a strange bug although.
Hi, I am using the suckerfish plugin. How can I make it so I can have a drop
down menu from a drop down menu.
-Menu
|
-menu 1
-menu 2
|
- menu 2.1
- menu 2.2
-menu 3
-menu 4
Thanks
-TJ
___
jQuery
Hi folks,
which of the following examples of global ajax handlers make more sense
and are easier to understand?
$(#msg).ajaxSuccess(function(){
$(this).append(liSuccessful Request!/li);
});
or
$.ajaxSuccess(function(){
$(#msg).append(liSuccessful Request!/li);
});
With chaining:
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Hi folks,
which of the following examples of global ajax handlers make more sense
and are easier to understand?
$(#msg).ajaxSuccess(function(){
$(this).append(liSuccessful Request!/li);
});
or
$.ajaxSuccess(function(){
$(#msg).append(liSuccessful
Well I think global should probably mean global and not attached to
anything but the jQuery object. Perhaps sometimes I don't want or need
to have an ajaxSuccess method be attached to a DOM node. The only way
I think having it like this:
$('#msg').ajaxStart(...
makes sense is if mutliple global
Good point about using $(../,this) as an alternative to using
$(this).parent(), though I've noticed that the syntax should be $(..,this)
to return the parent, while $(../,this) returns siblings. Does this sound
right?
Cheers,
George Adamson
Glen Lipka wrote:
Parent() works, and also xPath
I think the global responders should be attached to the jQuery object rather than to a DOM element. That said, it's very useful to be able to override the global responders for individual requests -- as Klaus points out, there are often XHR requests that don't merit the user's attention.
AndreOn
the global responders for individual requests -- as Klaus points out, there
are often XHR requests that don't merit the user's attention.
You can't really override the global responders. If you declare
local handlers they are called in addition to the global methods, not
instead of them.
Mike
Hi All,
Can i ask a copy of the first issue, attached and sent directly to my
email? I can't access the site as of 9:08 AM GMT +8 (Malay Peninsula
Time)...
Thanks in advance... c,)
Cheers,
cdelfino
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
Something is wrong with my server. I am working on getting it started up again.-- YehudaOn 9/24/06, Clodelio Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All,Can i ask a copy of the first issue, attached and sent directly to my
email? I can't access the site as of 9:08 AM GMT +8 (Malay
I don't see there is something deal with multiple-select situation in
forms.js. And serialize( ) in form.js, you return a hash value, and
this will only hold one value if the input element has the same name.
So I'd like your below idea introduce a serializeToString, and I
think it's better.
I need help to make the following code works in IE :
document.writeln(select name=\+name+\
id=\+name+\+((multiple!=null)? +multiple:)+);
var tablename = some_table;
$(#+name).load(table_query.php, {table: tablename});
document.writeln(\/select);
Script
On 9/25/06, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see there is something deal with multiple-select situation in
forms.js. And serialize( ) in form.js, you return a hash value, and
this will only hold one value if the input element has the same name.
So I'd like your below idea
The site is up and running! Digg it!-- YehudaOn 9/24/06, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something is wrong with my server. I am working on getting it started up again.-- Yehuda
On 9/24/06, Clodelio Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All,Can i ask a copy of the first issue, attached and
On 9/24/06, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also wonder if its 3 methods should just be added to core.
I think this would be a good idea. People to know Prototype (and
perhpas other frameworks) expect form functionality. As Mike said,
core is lacking in some features that form does very
25 matches
Mail list logo
