I have the same problem, and currently I'm using somewhat similar to approach one. I create hidden divs in my nested sortable container so they can accept new elements. I need to add two, otherwise I cannot drop below the first element (don't know why). I think this way is simpler since at the end
Hi, I'm building an application using jQuery, heavily based on the Sortable/Draggable interface. The interface is helping me a lot, however I've found some issues that heavily affect the performance and usability of my application, to the point where its deployment is at highrisk. I'll appreciate
so that we can see it orat least maybe just a test case?
--Brandon AaronOn 10/17/06, Raziel Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm performing css manipulation in my application, but the performance
degrades considerably fast as more markup is added. I tracked the problem to the jQuery.css function
Hi,
I'm performing css manipulation in my application, but the performance degrades considerably fast as more markup is added. I tracked the problem to the jQuery.css function, specifically for those cases where I'm setting the width and height. Even smalladditions to the markup inside of the
Thanks for the response. I'm trying to understand how the sortable handles work but I still don't have a clear idea, and how I can use them to fix the nested sortable problem. A brief explanation would be great.
thanks
On 10/12/06, Bryan Buchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's possible. the solution
FYI. I just figured out that the nesting of sortables actually works if you have at least one sortable item inside. It doesn't sound like a good solution but it's something. Oh, and it doesn't let you drop below the default item, just above it.
On 10/12/06, Raziel Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi all,
I'm using the sortable interface to create a component that can receive other components, and sort them around. However, if I add another sortable component/container inside,I cannot sort things inside of the new one. When I move a sibling component over the nested sortable container I
Thanks for all your responses. I actually do all the things that you mentioned: reusing the jQ object, chaining, setting a context, etc. Actually it would be helpful to have some performance analysis on the different kinds of queries, such as searching by ID, by element, class name, attribute,
I have this simple markup:
componentDom.innerHTML =
form action=""> h1 name=formTitle/h1 p name=formInstructions/p div name=top /div div name=formContent
divname=columndiv /div/div /div div name=bottom input type=submit name=defaultButton value=Submit/
/div/form
I'm executing this xpath
I have this simple markup:
componentDom.innerHTML =
form action=""> h1 name=formTitle/h1 p name=formInstructions/p div name=top /div div name=formContent
divname=columndiv /div/div /div div name=bottom input type=submit name=defaultButton value=Submit/
/div/form
I'm executing this xpath
I've been testing and I see many really simple XPath queries that just don't work, or they even break.
Is this broken in jQuery? Are they working for somebody?
thanks
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
port the full XPath standard but as you can see my expressions are really simple, andanyway it shouldn't break.
Thanks
On 10/3/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raziel Alvarez schrieb: I've been testing and I see many really simple XPath queries that just
don't work, or th
I have this simple markup:
componentDom.innerHTML =
form action=""> h1 name=formTitle/h1 p name=formInstructions/p div name=top /div div name=formContent
divname=columndiv /div/div /div div name=bottom input type=submit name=defaultButton value=Submit/
/div/form
I'm executing this xpath calls
Ok, I won't argue anymore about the clone(), though I think it's not the behaviour that anyone expects (think on the cloneNode() function) and the documentation then is incorrect or very very confusing: Create cloned copies of all matched DOM Elements. This does not create a cloned copy of this
The clone() function returns the cloned object instead of a copy. Thus, when I modify what it should be the copy, it modifies the original too. This only occurs when I assign the object to clone to a variable and use this variable to call the clone function. For example:
// works as expected
BODYp/p/BODY
$('p').children();
breaks in sibling: function(elem, pos, not); elem parameter is null since there are no children.
Is there a fix for this problem?
thanks
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
PROTECTED] wrote:
Raziel Alvarez schrieb: The clone() function returns the cloned object instead of a copy. Thus, when I modify what it should be the copy, it modifies the
original too. This only occurs when I assign the object to clone to a variable and use this variable to call the clone function
17 matches
Mail list logo