Hi folks,
I have a tabulated set of data (table id=tbl_assetList), with the
last column of each row providing a delete it link to the following
function...
function fnDeleteNodeTransaction(ni,pi,ai){
$(#theIndicator3).show();
$(#tbl_assetList a).click(function(){$(tr).hide()});
$(tr).hide() matches all tr tags and hides them. If you want to hide the
tr that contained the link that was clicked, you might try something like
this:
$(#tbl_assetList a).click(function(){$(this).ancestors(tr).hide()});
That will hide all the TR tags that are up the DOM tree from the clicked
Thanks Erik,
Unfortunately your line of code hid all the rows in the table,
including the one that was clicked. If I just wanted to hide the row
that was clicked, how would your line be altered?
Bruce
At 10:38 a.m. 28/11/2006, you wrote:
$(tr).hide() matches all tr tags and hides them.
On 11/27/06, Bruce MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Erik,
Unfortunately your line of code hid all the rows in the table, including
the one that was clicked. If I just wanted to hide the row that was
clicked, how would your line be altered?
You could try to just call .parent('tr')
I just tried it and it worked fine. My guess is you don't properly close
tags inside your table. Here's what I just did and it worked fine:
table border=1
tr
tdSome Data/td
tda href=#Foo/a/td
/tr
tr
tdSome Data 2/td
tda href=#Foo/a/td
/tr
/table
Not if you have well formatted tables. There should be a TD between the A
and TR. You could do .parents('tr'), which is the same as ancestors.
Not to hijack this thread, but maybe someone who is more familiar could
share with us which function is preferred, parents or ancestors?
--Erik
On
They're identical. John coded parents(), and then for semantic
correctness and compatibility with XSLT added the ancestors() alias.
Corey
On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Erik Beeson wrote:
Not if you have well formatted tables. There should be a TD between
the A and TR. You could do
Yes, of course you are correct.
I did think to check the table's tags for completeness, but my
checking was not sufficiently thorough.
Sorry for the added imposition and thanks again for the help,
-- Bruce
At 11:14 a.m. 28/11/2006, you wrote:
I just tried it and it worked fine. My guess is
