Matt, are you reading this list? I am anxiously awaiting the jQuery port of
your table filtering/sorting functionality. Is this coming soon? The demos
on your site are very very fast and would fit perfectly into a project I'm
about to start.
--
View this message in context:
Matt, are you reading this list?
Yes.
I am anxiously awaiting the jQuery port of
your table filtering/sorting functionality. Is this coming soon?
Within a week or so, I hope.
http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/lib/tablenew/
is where it's at right now.
I'm a bit torn about how much actual
To give you some ideas on what I'm looking for:
The project I'm working deals with a large amount of tabular data. I am
looking for an easy way to bind sorting/filtering to the tables they work
with that would allow someone to filter by month/year in a column that
contains dates in a predefined
$(table).mattsTables({ // TableWide options
...
Why this as opposed to putting simple class names in the table like
table class=table-autosort table-autofilter table-autopage:20
table-rowshade:alternate ...
..
th class=table-sort:numeric table-filterable
?
dateofbirth: {sortable:true,
Thanks for the response. This is an accepted forum for jQuery plugins, and
the best way to find out if people are interested is to see the response to
messages like this. Maybe it is only me :)
Why this? Mostly because it feels more organized and fits with the general
syntax of other jquery
Just a general question - How big of a data table is this script effective
for? At what point does it make more sense to go back to the server?
For sorting I've used it on tables approaching 1,000 rows and the performance
was just fine. The speed of the script is much better than most other
