My mistake. You're correct.
Erin
>On Friday, November 24, 2006 8:53 AM Erin Doak <> said:
>
>> I'm relatively new to jQuery but am excited about using it. I
>> recently posted a request to have the jQuery library added to the
>> list of libraries supported natively by VirtualMart, a Joomla
>> eco
On Friday, November 24, 2006 8:53 AM Erin Doak <> said:
> I'm relatively new to jQuery but am excited about using it. I
> recently posted a request to have the jQuery library added to the
> list of libraries supported natively by VirtualMart, a Joomla
> ecommerce component. The author of VirtualMa
The solution is actually relatively simple. If enough people who depend
on the software request it, they'll give it more consideration. It's easy
to rebuff one person. It's harder to to that to a larger chunk of the
user community.
What I would do to start, though, is answer his points directly
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
> I always thought they had fixed that in Prototype 1.5...? But it's still
>RC as it seems.
>
I just checked 1.4.0: The only addition to Object is an extend function,
but nothing to Object.prototype.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
>> There's a lot more trouble the other way round, since Prototype unwisely
>> extends Object. Every other framework and Javascript code fragment is
>> somehow expected to deal with that, even though it totally hoses
>> Javascript's native for-in loops. It's like we're all supp
Dave Methvin schrieb:
>> And as Sam said, jQuery need not break Prototype (I, in fact, use
>> Prototype and jQuery together on a major commercial Rails project
>> I'm working on at the moment).
>
>>From day 1 jQuery has gone out of its way to avoid breaking Prototype.
> There's a lot more trou
> And as Sam said, jQuery need not break Prototype (I, in fact, use
> Prototype and jQuery together on a major commercial Rails project
> I'm working on at the moment).
>From day 1 jQuery has gone out of its way to avoid breaking Prototype.
There's a lot more trouble the other way round, since
Hi Danial,
That's awesome! This is the type of feedback that the Joomla virtual
mart lead developer needs to hear. Would you mind replying to his post here:
http://virtuemart.net/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=71&topic=23597.0
Thanks,
Rey
Danial Tzadeh wrote:
> I'm a Joomla! developer too an
I'm a Joomla! developer too and my products (Clexus Gallery and PM) were
based on Proto & Scr. I was struggling with them much and the template codes
were too crowded with JS codes, so nobody could easily change them and also
people were tired of waiting many seconds for the page to load (not all
I'm not sure how to even respond to that. He obviously didn't even take a
cursory look at jQuery (the jQuery DOM-centric approach is decidedly
different, and probably more powerful than Prototype's monolithic approach).
And as Sam said, jQuery need not break Prototype (I, in fact, use Prototype
an
On 24/11/06, Erin Doak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm relatively new to jQuery but am excited about using it. I
> recently posted a request to have the jQuery library added to the
> list of libraries supported natively by VirtualMart, a Joomla
> ecommerce component. The author of VirtualMart has
I'm relatively new to jQuery but am excited about using it. I
recently posted a request to have the jQuery library added to the
list of libraries supported natively by VirtualMart, a Joomla
ecommerce component. The author of VirtualMart has rejected the
request:
http://virtuemart.net/index.php
12 matches
Mail list logo
