Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-20 Thread Anil Belur
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:31 PM Anil Belur wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:29 PM Robert Varga wrote: > >> On 11/01/2019 06:02, Michael Vorburger wrote: >> > As an alternative we could skip the combined Java 8/Java 11 >> release, >> > going directly to a Java 11-only

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-14 Thread Lori Jakab
We have our first passing openjdk11 verify job! https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/lispflowmapping-maven-verify-neon-mvn35-openjdk11/1/ -Lori On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM Lori Jakab wrote: > > Excellent, thanks, I just proposed a patch for lispflowmapping: >

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-14 Thread Lori Jakab
Excellent, thanks, I just proposed a patch for lispflowmapping: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/79507/ -Lori On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:42 AM Anil Belur wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 8:37 PM Anil Belur wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:49 PM Lori Jakab >> wrote: >>>

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-14 Thread Anil Belur
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 8:37 PM Anil Belur wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:49 PM Lori Jakab > wrote: > >> Hi Anil, >> >> Would it be possible for project to create an openjdk11 verify job in >> addition to the existing default job by modifying their >> jjb/{project}/{project}.yaml file?

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-14 Thread Lori Jakab
Hi Anil, Would it be possible for project to create an openjdk11 verify job in addition to the existing default job by modifying their jjb/{project}/{project}.yaml file? That would be helpful for projects which already build with JDK 11 to avoid regressing. Thanks, -Lori On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-14 Thread Anil Belur
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:29 PM Robert Varga wrote: > On 11/01/2019 06:02, Michael Vorburger wrote: > > As an alternative we could skip the combined Java 8/Java 11 > release, > > going directly to a Java 11-only release -- either with Sodium > > or with > >

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-11 Thread Robert Varga
On 11/01/2019 06:02, Michael Vorburger wrote: > I would like to start the discussion around the options we have and > preferences of both OpenDaylight projects and our downstreams. > > > Speaking officially for Red Hat, we may need a week or so to internally > discuss and confirm

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-11 Thread Robert Varga
On 11/01/2019 06:02, Michael Vorburger wrote: > As an alternative we could skip the combined Java 8/Java 11 release, > going directly to a Java 11-only release -- either with Sodium > or with > Magnesium. > > > +1 > > It seems reasonable to target Sodium

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-11 Thread Michael Vorburger
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, 16:02 Daniel Farrell On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 7:31 PM Robert Varga wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> as I noted in previous updates, our Neon release stream looks rather >> good where JDK11 compatibility is concerned, with my local builds with >> JDK11 passing with minor fixes

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Java 11 adoption

2019-01-10 Thread Daniel Farrell
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 7:31 PM Robert Varga wrote: > Hello everyone, > > as I noted in previous updates, our Neon release stream looks rather > good where JDK11 compatibility is concerned, with my local builds with > JDK11 passing with minor fixes (submitted) up to and including > openflowplugin.