René A. Enguehard wrote:
If you want to be even more granular, you can say "closed source
software" as well. There does exist software which has a closed source
but is not directly proprietary. For instance, parts of the QNX kernel
code are not shown with the standard source code and to be able
If you want to be even more granular, you can say "closed source
software" as well. There does exist software which has a closed source
but is not directly proprietary. For instance, parts of the QNX kernel
code are not shown with the standard source code and to be able to view
them you must si
Folks,
just a little reminder that we should be careful in terminology (because
it came up in this thread several times already, this it is not a
specific criticism of your content, Ravi).
The term "commercial software" [1] does *not* exclude Free and Open
Source software. Therefore it does not ma
