Wish to know does this violate licensing.
Qgis is just as an example, it can be Grass or Ossim or any other Open GIS as
well
Example: I love Qgis and I have added some code to Qgis as a C++ programmer,
thus giving the necessary customization for my specific client. I compile it
and distribute
IFAIK, yes: if you distribute the executables, you have to distribute also
the source, for all GPL programs.
All the best.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ravi ravivundava...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Wish to know does this violate licensing.
Qgis is just as an example, it can be Grass or
Hi,
For information of developers interested in geometry tools and
future of Generic Geometry Library (http://trac.osgeo.org/ggl/), the
Formal Review of the GGL within the Boost Community has started
and is being conducted by Hartmut Kaiser as the review manager.
Here are details:
Forwarding on behalf of Marco.
All the best.
Original Message
Subject: AW: [Qgis-user] Licensing
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:35:30 +0100
From: Hugentobler Marco marco.hugentob...@karto.baug.ethz.ch
To: Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it, Ravi
ravivundava...@yahoo.com
Hi
I'm
ARC-GIS 9.2 uses GDAL
Need some pointers to Licensing or agreement there on.
I am frequently asked questions on this.
Example: ILWIS uses GDAL and became OpenGIS
How come ESRI uses GDAL too, does open source support closed source too..
Ravi Kumar
The INTERNET now has a personality.
Ravi wrote:
ARC-GIS 9.2 uses GDAL
Need some pointers to Licensing or agreement there on. I am
frequently asked questions on this. Example: ILWIS uses GDAL and
became OpenGIS How come ESRI uses GDAL too, does open source support
closed source too..
You need to learn about the basic
Le samedi 07 novembre 2009, Ravi a écrit :
How come ESRI uses GDAL too, does open source support closed source too.
Hi,
It depends the OS Licence. GDAL licence is BSD-Like [1].
Some other are usinng GPL-LIKe licence. This kind of licence does not allow
closed source to user open source
Paolo, Marco,
This is true but as long as you do not release your modifications.
Release means distributing for free, selling or any form of publishing.
I understand Ravi's case as releasing, as he wrote:
or my specific client
A client is probably an out-house entity.
Best regards,
Mateusz
The following FAQ present in GNU/GPL page will clarify the doubts surrounding
this discussion.
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html#UnreleasedMods
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html#DevelopChangesUnderNDA
