Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: fastest option of serving huge imagery on web map on the fly

2010-05-22 Thread Christopher Schmidt
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:24:26PM -0300, Fabio Renzo Panettieri wrote: On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:17 -0700, Karsten-3-2 wrote: Yes. What I want to do is simply to find out the fastest options to render on the fly from raw data imagery (no tiles whatsoever stored on disk in addition to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: fastest option of serving huge imagery on web map on the fly

2010-05-22 Thread Oliver Tonnhofer
On 21.05.2010, at 22:11, karsten vennemann wrote: Ok I was not yet familiar how MapProxy really works - from what I read it seemed not to store any physical tiles I thought (only the request parameters), but I guess that is wrong .. It does cache tiles permanently on disk. It does this in

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] fastest option of serving huge imagery on web map on the fly

2010-05-22 Thread Jason Birch
I've often wondered if power-of-two was the best approach from a perception viewpoint. It definitely makes the most sense from a code perspective. Anyone know of any research on this? On 2010-05-22, Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:24:26PM -0300,