Your comments on specific logos for specific items is good; and amounts to a
very light feature comparison.
GeoTools ran into the limits of our own 5 star system; we ended up needing a
different set of "stars" depending on the the kind of module being described.
The "limit" was when we entered
Dave,
I'm hoping most projects are represented on this discuss list.
However, I'll also be contacting all our OSGeo Live project contact
people in the next couple of days as we kick off the OSGeo Live build
process. I'll make sure that each project can comment on the "Project
Overview" which i
One suggestion - since there is a lot of concern about the idea of "rating"
projects, maybe the PSCs of each of the projects should be consulted before
going ahead with this? After all -- it's for each of these projects' benefits
that this is being considered, and if the various PSC consensus is
> that projects that have applied for
Good...
> or are mature enough to apply
...But does "mature enough" mean Criteria 1-3 are met, or that some of the
Desirables are met too, or..?
-mpg
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Cameron Sho
brian heap wrote:
will osgeo have a presence at the Canadian hydrographic conference in
Quebec City starting June 19?
No, I am not aware of anyone specifically representing or talking about
OSGeo at CHC2010 (http://www.chc2010.ca/).
Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
___
will osgeo have a presence at the Canadian hydrographic conference in
Quebec City starting June 19?
On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
Hi Everyone,
It is with great pleasure that I remind you all that the Rendez-vous
OSGeo-Québec (http://rendez-vous-osgeo-qc.org/2010/) i
On 11/06/10 01:59, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
(Along those lines, I'd also ask precisely what "ready to start" incubation
means...)
"Ready to start incubation" implies that projects that have applied for,
or are mature enough to apply, can be ranked at the same level as
projects in incubation.
I'd suggest that a set of N icons/logos accompanied by the words "mature" /
"beta" / etc would be better than stars, as it directly indicates to the
customer what we're using as a metric.
Fixed, well-defined categories like this are good, because we do not want to
get into subjective arguments
> Your comments have been good in that they have made me think deeper
(Great, what more could anyone hope for?)
Anyway, I think you might be selling OSGeo short -- our very presence indicates
an implicit level of coordination and maturity that people will intuitively
and implicitly grok.
-mpg
Dave,
So maybe we should have 1-5 stars (or osgeo logos) which is quickly
visually understood by our target audience, and that is followed by a
word or two describing each star rating.
5 logos (not used yet)
4 logos (very mature - passed osgeo incubation)
3 logos (mature - started or ready to
10 matches
Mail list logo
