Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2013 Nottingham Update

2013-05-11 Thread Cameron Shorter
On 11/05/13 07:54, pcr...@pcreso.com wrote: I think a community vote on workshops is a good idea, and if there is good support for more than planned, I'd suggest the plan needs changing, rather than reduce the relevance value of the event that the attendees have voted for. I'm aware this

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Evolving FOSS4G [was: FOSS4G 2013 Nottingham Update ]

2013-05-11 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Adrian, I hope I will not break your thread/thought with my considerations. But I think you are right, it is all about evolution. Let me explain. And I am not arguing or whatever, I am really just trying to find my place in the osgeo world :) I develop for scientific open source project since

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2013 Nottingham Update

2013-05-11 Thread pcreso
Hi Cameron, The voice of 2009 experience? If I can, I'm happy to. I did organise the 2011 International Symposium on GIS in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences here in NZ, and managed to give it a somewhat Open Source flavour :-) A very different scale to FOSS4G. Not many venues in li'l ol' NZ

[OSGeo-Discuss] [Live-demo] OSGeoLive 7.0 status: alpha1

2013-05-11 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi all, After the last round of e-mails about the base OS for OSGeoLive 7.0, this is the first alpha based on Xubuntu LTS 12.04.2: http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/7.0/ http://osprey.ucdavis.edu/downloads/osgeo/gisvm/gisvm/7.0alpha1/ I think it is a good time for projects to start updating