I'm happy to announce that the community vote for the additional workshop
sessions at FOSS4G 2013 is now available at:
http://community-review.foss4g.org/ and will be open for a week until 6th
June.
As you will of no doubt heard we've also extended the Early Bird until 14th
June.
Thanks,
Matt.
Margherita and others.
I agree with you, that the situation has developed in a bad way. My
expectations were higher, than the general enthusiasm in OSGeo
community. Maybe we are slowly approaching into post-INSPIRE era, where
everything is set, software is deployed and there is no or only little
Hi Everyone,
Just to let you know that we've extended the Early Bird deadline for
booking FOSS4G until 14th June to take into account the additional workshop
voting and to allow us to get a full timetable up for you to view. Details
on the site: http://2013.foss4g.org/registration/. Details to
I agree, it would be a good occasion to talk about inspire and open source
projects.
But I also think there wasn't enough time to prepare the workshop,
motivations, topics to discuss, etc.
Anyway, I like the idea, and I hope next conference we can try again with
better results.
Best regard!.
All,
Not sure who to ask but figured this list could provide some insight. I'd like
to take the OSGeo-Live [1] and make it available on VM Depot [2] run by
Microsoft Open Tech. VM Depot is really just a community catalog of VMs that
could be easily spun up on Microsoft Azure. I would
Hi Alex,
Will definitely let the community know when this is done. Fairly certain
we'll have a quick start on how to do get the VM going and if you guys
want to add this documentation upstream in the site that would be great,
are you the person to send that type of information to? This is
Adrian,
According to http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_membership we have open slots.
It seems that Arnulf and Michael can authorize it. There are some fairly
restrictive conditions on OGC individual memberships which is what this is.
You should confirm you are going to fit.
On 5/30/13 2:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Adrian,
According to http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_membership we have open slots.
It seems that Arnulf and Michael can authorize it. There are some fairly
restrictive conditions on OGC individual memberships which is what this is.
You should
Paul,
If you write a quickstart we can grant you access to commit it to the
svn repository directly (see
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc#Subversion). Or you can send
the file to the OSGeo Live mailing list (
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo) or attach it to a
+1 from me too.
Based on the depth of valuable feedback that OGC received from OSGeo
regarding Geoservices REST API, with Adrian being a significant
contributor, I believe that we have a good argument to ask for voting
rights. (We might not get it, but at least we should ask).
On
Hi Cameron,
I've been also thinking of OGC voting rights for the OSGeo Foundation.
I wonder if we should discuss this together during the next Board
meeting. (how OSGeo can become a voting member)
-jeff
On 2013-05-30 5:31 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
+1 from me too.
Based on the depth of
OGC voting organisations typically have 1 vote, (2 people who have
permissions to caste that vote), and each organisation has their own
process for determining that vote.
I'd suggest that OSGeo should have a committee and set of processes for
determining the vote. One issue we are going to
Adrian showed himself to be a level-headed and rational discoursant during
the recent kerfuffle.
If Adrian is willing, I'd support a motion to put him in charge of, or at
least a member of, some sort of effort to engage with OGC to find out the
Best Way Forward for our two organizations.
I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
