On 27 October 2013 22:04, Wilko Quak wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The paper is from 2005
Yes, that's what Springer says:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-26772-7_1
> and uses PostGIS 0.6.2.
I see, I missed that important detail.
> I am not sure whether PostGIS
> had an ST_IsValid fun
What’s the publication date on this? The PostGIS results are wrong, at least in
that they only show the input validation (PostGIS will accept almost any WKT
input, with the exception of unclosed rings) and not ST_IsValid validation.
P.
On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
