Dear Peter,
I'm really interested in this! If needed, I will be happy to give some
help to this project. Let me konw :)
Andrea
2013/12/4 Peter Baumann p.baum...@jacobs-university.de:
Hi again Andrea,
I forgot to mention that the goal is to establish planetary CRS definitions
accepted by
The material for FOSS4G 2013 for possible archiving amounts to:
1. Static web site, including mapgallery HTML but not including
mapgallery images: 74Mb
2. MapGallery imagery: 350Mb
3. Basecamp archive: ???Mb - contains discussions, documents etc
4. Google Docs: ???Mb
I'm responsible for 1
There's already a repository for 2013 at
http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2013/ it has some files in it (mainly bid
documents at present that I uploaded at the start of the process). I'm
currently wgetting the basecamp project that we were using, so I can verify
that we will also be archiving
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jo Cook joc...@astuntechnology.com wrote:
There's already a repository for 2013 at
http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2013/ it has some files in it (mainly bid
documents at present that I uploaded at the start of the process). I'm
currently wgetting the basecamp
As for the Basecamp archive, it's likely useless as-is, but what should
be done is to extract out the individual parts (docs, raw logos) then
upload them individually to SVN, and then move the discussions into
OSGeo wiki pages. Of course this is much easier to do from the
beginning of the event
I disagree completely about the basecamp archive. The whole purpose of what
I'm doing at the moment is to archive it in a useful format, with
discussion threads linking to files rather than a bunch of wiki pages. I
appreciate that preserving things on the wiki is a good idea, and that's
what we
On 12/04/2013 08:00 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jo Cook joc...@astuntechnology.com wrote:
There's already a repository for 2013 at
http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2013/ it has some files in it (mainly bid
documents at present that I uploaded at the start of
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
The size in general is not an issue. You're right that sticking that
much in svn is usually a pain, but not if it's one time deal. This is a
good question for the System Admin Committee to ponder though. I think
Greetings denizens of osgeo-discuss,
I hope you're having a great fall.
We here on the FOSS4G 2014 Committee are looking for a few good women (or men)
to speak in our invited speaker slots. We know who we know, but the collective
knowledge of community is so much broader. We need you to let
