Excellent initiative, Steven. Thank you! I had something similar on my
todo list but I got overwhelm by the FOSS4G activities here in Seoul.
Once again, thank you. I also invite all the candidates to take a little
bit of time and create an entry on the wiki or simply send an e-mail to
the
+1
That's a great idea Steven, with the membership growing and being more
diverse, we can't expect that all candidates are well known by everyone so
a brief mail answering your questions (and an update on the wiki) would be
really cool.
Greetings from the OSGeo Park at Intergeo15 :-)
--
Jorge
Peter,
If you are unable to explain your conduct issue in detail (since you
mention the issue is one single person), you can take this to the Code
of Conduct Committee (possibly privately at
coc-private-ow...@lists.osgeo.org or publicly at
Hi Peter,
It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to
understand your full issue. Can you please explain here to everyone
what you mean by "I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some
time in the past". Claimed how/where/in what way? As far as I know,
rasdaman is
Hi Peter,
I think your request to have ownership of Rasdaman "corrected" to be
owned by GmbH is reasonable, especially since the license of code I
assume shows reference to GmbH? I also assume this could be confirmed if
someone were to check the lineage of code commits?
I'd hope that this
I am having a hard time seeing how this is a CoC matter.
Camille
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to
> understand your full issue. Can you please explain here to
Hi Cameron,
I was very surprised to see the email below. It seems to me that the issue
may just be a simple misunderstanding by someone, not a deliberate act of
sabotage.
I'll add some comments as the OSGeo Incubation Mentor for the Rasdaman
project:
Thanks for digging out the reference at