Okay, this whole thread did not make sense to me until I digged further
in the Google search link that was in the first email.
I think the page in question is this one:
http://www.osgeo.org/sponsors/autodesk
It is safe to say that it should be removed today since Autodesk are no
longer
On 2015-10-14 10:49 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The tone was "suprised" and "disappointed".
Does advertising proprietary software solutions
on OSGeo website count as "championing" for its cause ?
I wouldn't expect that from my Open Source Compass.
Or am I being misleaded by the lack of info on
On 14 October 2015 at 16:20, Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
>> The tone was "suprised" and "disappointed".
>>
>> Does advertising proprietary software solutions
>> on OSGeo website count as
On 2015-10-14 11:34 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
Thanks Daniel. Also, you likely saw in your inbox this morning that
Mike/Treasurer was asking questions about how to manage the sponsors;
please if you have time can you answer him about that? I think he's
trying to understand who is a current
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Again I am trying to read your tone in your e-mail. I believe you
> are now not questioning the accuracy of the list of sponsors on
> http://www.osgeo.org/content/sponsorship/sponsors.html but I believe
> you are now questioning
On 2015-10-14 12:16 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
Okay, this whole thread did not make sense to me until I digged further
in the Google search link that was in the first email.
I think the page in question is this one:
http://www.osgeo.org/sponsors/autodesk
It is safe to say that it should be
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:20:43PM +0100, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
> As long as they obey the license terms, I don't think OSGeo should
> worry about taking money from PropGeo Corp. OSGeo does not suffer from
> Stallmania, an uncontrollable urge to insist all software should be
> free.
I'm not
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> The tone was "suprised" and "disappointed".
>
> Does advertising proprietary software solutions
> on OSGeo website count as "championing" for its cause ?
> I wouldn't expect that from my Open Source Compass.
>
> Or am I
Of course [1] is one reason why Stallman implemented the copyleft requirement:
http://opensource.org/faq#copyleft
— Andy
On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
> As long as they obey the license terms, I don't think OSGeo should
> worry
On 10/14/2015 03:07 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Are there no more sponsors for OSGeo, or is the sponsors page broken ?
> http://www.osgeo.org/sponsors
>
> If you ask google, it gives big visibility to AutoDesk as a sponsor:
> https://www.google.it/search?q=osgeo+sponsors
> Taking you to a page
Dear OSGeo Community,
we are pleased to inform you that Google has announced GSoC 2016 [1,2].
In case OSGeo gets accepted as mentoring organisation, we (madi[3])
are considering to admin also this year. If there are more volunteers, this
is the right time to show up and contact us, this list, or
@board:
Maybe OSGeo should take action to protect it. It is not because OSGeo is
an open and inclusive organisation, where membership is free as all the
products, tools and libraries, that we shouldn't protect these valuable
assets.
It is better to protect and grant the use to other
Dear Ravi,
what are the requirements for a website to host any successor for Fonhub?
Regards - Franz-Josef
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi Sandro,
I am trying to understand your tone of your e-mail, but I think you are
asking if the sponsors page is accurate/uptodate. This is a good
question. I will ask the OSGeo Treasurer for an accurate list of
sponsors, and I will update that page.
On a bigger picture, OSGeo is always
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:52:14AM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> I am trying to understand your tone of your e-mail, but I think you
> are asking if the sponsors page is accurate/uptodate. This is a
> good question. I will ask the OSGeo Treasurer for an accurate list
> of
Are there no more sponsors for OSGeo, or is the sponsors page broken ?
http://www.osgeo.org/sponsors
If you ask google, it gives big visibility to AutoDesk as a sponsor:
https://www.google.it/search?q=osgeo+sponsors
Taking you to a page (hosted by osgeo) with many links back to proprietary
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
> It may be also worth to observe the differences between FOSS vs OSS,
> and that there is no mention of "Free" on the http://www.osgeo.org front
page.
> Please, notice there is OSI, not FSF, logo on
>
17 matches
Mail list logo