mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Brian Russo / (808) 271 4166
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Brian Russo / (808) 271 4166
list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Christopher Schmidt
Web Developer
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Brian Russo / (808) 271 4166
, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
The latent arrogance displayed in this thread is more destructive than
any software license.
I'm not trying to be arrogant, I'm sorry if it came off that way. I
with
FOSS4G.
No more than an argument that proprietary software is weak for
'needing' to leverage open source. And how is selling compatibility
with FOSS4G bad? Isn't that the goal?
--
Brian Russo / (808) 271 4166
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss
2010 22:44, Brian Russo br...@beruna.org wrote:
I'm having trouble thinking of any, since encryption isn't really a
big factor in most GIS software. Even if it is a component of the
software, as long as those encryption components reside outside of it
in openssl or similar - while
Can you give an example of some osgeo software that is a concern for
US export controls?
I'm having trouble thinking of any, since encryption isn't really a
big factor in most GIS software. Even if it is a component of the
software, as long as those encryption components reside outside of it
in
I'm looking for some feedback on open source spatial ETL tools (or just
regular ETL tools that you've used in some spatial workflow). I'm aware of
GeoKettle (Pentaho) and Spatial Data Integrator (Talend). My focus is on
relatively simple processing of moderate to large amounts of bulk data, but
I do not think a simple feature comparison is very useful. Seeing workflows
that happen to use XYZ software or.. how we transitioned from ABC
proprietary software to XYZ open source and improved performance 10% while
reducing costs 20% etc.. that's useful and convincing. Knowing that ABC
I think a more interesting presentation would be why there are so many
desktop GIS packages, the consequent pros/cons, and if/how efforts could be
consolidated.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Stefan Steiniger sst...@geo.uzh.chwrote:
Hei all,
thanks for Cameron on keeping me in the loop,
. And no, efforts cannot be consolidated (active
intervention) they may consolidate (natural progression).
P.
- Why? Because, we felt like it, and we knew better.
- Pros and cons? Weighted in favor of the
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Brian Russo br...@beruna.org wrote:
I think a more
I find the underlying bias of this discussion itself fascinating. Landon is
right that surveying/engineering is male-dominated; yet nobody complains
that nursing is female-dominated. I have to wonder what really is the
problem? Money aside - what's inherently wrong with fewer women in
Well of course, Redlands is ESRI's corporate HQ after all.
- bri
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, James Reid james.r...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
All, a colleague from our local chapter has recently been at Redlands
Institute and emailed me the following link:
, steer the ESRI ship
towards more open waters!
regards,
- bri
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:24 AM, James Reid james.r...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
and M$ too but actually the Redlands Institute is a little wider than
that (how independent is another matter)...
Brian Russo wrote:
Well of course, Redlands
If you have big commercial customers I'd approach them. If they're
heavily invested in your software then they could see the value
potentially.
I understand what you're saying tho. Most of the organically-grown
projects are those that started as open source and don't compare well
to closed2open
Playing a bit of devil's advocate but (broadly speaking) if you want
your app to be interchangeable with different implementations of
(nontrivial) standards you always need to test interoperability anyway
because even in (unattainable) perfectly bug-free software there is
always some variance due
At first glance, my initial reaction is he's merely misinformed.
However, after reviewing his blog and comments elsewhere; it's not just sad
- it's outright funny how indoctrinated he is. We use a lot of proprietary
software because we have a specific community we need to interoperate with,
but
I think it's an interesting problem to solve (Sharing gis models/processes),
but...
* Way too heavyweight for us, I don't have time/interest to build
maintain sheets of DXFs manually
* Of little practical use for us since our processes typically grow pretty
organically with small meetings and
404
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Richard Greenwood
richard.greenw...@gmail.com wrote:
A friend of my prepared this analysis of geodata distribution and fees at
the county government level in the US:
http://home.centurytel.net/wilsonlandsurvey/docs/GIS Data as Public
Good to see that the case law seems to support disclosure.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Richard Greenwood
richard.greenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe this URL will work.
http://home.centurytel.net/wilsonlandsurvey/docs/GIS Data as Public
I've seen legends similar to that before; afraid I can't offer anything
solid in terms of prior art examples but it's hardly as revolutionary as
they seem to think.
Pretty absurd if you ask me;
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:34 AM, René A. Enguehard ahugen...@gmail.comwrote:
I suspect they might be
Property, Patents, and Web Mapping: Historical
Perspective at http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=28360.
- Bill Thoen
GISnet - www.gisnet.com
Brian Russo wrote:
I've seen legends similar to that before; afraid I can't offer anything
solid in terms of prior art examples
, Intellectual Property, Patents, and Web Mapping:
Historical Perspective at
http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=28360.
- Bill Thoen
GISnet - www.gisnet.com
Brian Russo wrote:
I've seen legends similar to that before; afraid I can't offer
anything solid in terms of prior art
-discussion
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Brian
24 matches
Mail list logo
