Hi Jo,
I agree, but It seems EPSG:3785 it's the official code for
Spherical/Web Mercator so it should be the one on this updated spec.
http://www.spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3785/ ,
http://www.iter.dk/post/2008/05/SphericalWeb-Mercator-EPSG-code-3785.aspx
I'm looking for authority
Hi
As I have some perspective about gvSIG (I was directly involved last 6
years), I may suggest you to contact directly with people in charge of
the project both in main founder and two main contractors:
CIT (Generalitat Valenciana): Martín García or Gabriel Carrión
IVER: Pepe Vidal or Alvaro
(Sorry if duplicated. it doesn't seem to be arrived first time)
Hi,
one thing must be taken in account, IMHO. If I'm not wrong OSGeo is
an USA foundation (is registered in the States, and must follow his
laws, of course. As USA maintains a commercial embargo to Cuba [1], it
seems there are a
Hi,
one thing must be taken in account, IMHO. If I'm not wrong OSGeo is
an USA foundation (is registered in the States, and must follow his
laws, of course. As USA maintains a commercial embargo to Cuba [1], it
seems there are a lot of things in technology fields restricted to
American
Sorry Chris, I'm getting an error 404 with your link.
best regards
Luis
Chris Holmes wrote:
So it looks like we got this:
http://www.fgdc.gov/grants/2007CAP/Category2/07HQAG-NY
Thanks to everyone for your support, and for the letter from OSGeo,
I'm sure it helped our application.
Hi Gilberto (and list),
only a couple of notes
Gilberto Camara wrote:
Dear OSGEO Discussion List members:
Paul Ramsey´s remarks are right on target.
First, GIS is a large arena and there are
different motivations for developers, that
prevent them from joining a single project such as
Hi Landon,
maybe you'll find usefull also some of the OGC works. For instanc
the paper 06-022r1 Temporal Standard Recomendations,
greetings
Luis
Landon Blake wrote:
I made updates and/or corrections to the wiki page for Time In GIS
requested by Brent Fraser and Grant Pezeshki.
17 November 2007 08:08:08 pm Luis W. Sevilla wrote:
Hi,
+1 for GML with BXML encoding as next open standard. GML 3.* with his
ability to be 'profiled' seems to be on the base of almost all and
every OGC norm being proposed on last 2-3 years. As Rob Atkinson said to
me, BXML may be an encoding
on it here:
http://www.ogcnetwork.net/node/189
(schema and examples)
I think it's slightly different (simpler and geometry harmonized with
GeoRSS GML) than what's at http://www.cubewerx.com/web/guest/bxml,
but the idea is the same.
---
Raj
On Nov 17, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Luis W. Sevilla wrote:
Hi
Hi,
+1 for GML with BXML encoding as next open standard. GML 3.* with his
ability to be 'profiled' seems to be on the base of almost all and
every OGC norm being proposed on last 2-3 years. As Rob Atkinson said to
me, BXML may be an encoding for GML, in a way no standard needs to be
modifyed to
10 matches
Mail list logo
