Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Broken GPG signatures (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:06:13PM +0100, Jorge Sanz via Discuss wrote: > On 2024-02-01 7:00, Sandro Santilli via Discuss wrote: > > > The GPG issue is related to how the MUA searches for a public key > > associated with the From address, which is always an @osgeo.org addres

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Broken GPG signatures (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

Jorge Sanz has some experience. > >Cheers, >Javier > >On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 18:33, Sandro Santilli via Discuss < >discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this >> list are currently unverifiable due

[OSGeo-Discuss] Broken GPG signatures (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this list are currently unverifiable due to the email address of the sender NOT being in the From field. Example: From: Jorge Sanz via Discuss To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fw: Re: Change in mailing list configuration

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:47:43AM -0800, David Bianco via Discuss wrote: > Having [OSGeo-Discuss] in the subject field also helps with *visual* > filtering. > For those of us who have 1 folder for all the listserv they are on (geo and > non-geo). > Or, for emails that get fwd to non-listserv

[OSGeo-Discuss] Email filtering (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Christian Willmes wrote: > you are messing with my filter configuration and I dislike this (very much). Would you consider sharing detail of your filter software so that someone might help you with converting it to use email headers ? Email coming from

[OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing list config change reverted (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:06:11AM -0500, Daniel Morissette wrote: > On 2024-01-12 08:05, Jeroen Ticheler wrote: > > Hi Sandro and others, > > My suggestion would be to re-instate the old configuration and first > > propose and discuss a possible update. Such discussion and eventual > > update

Re: Fw: Re: Change in mailing list configuration

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:37:26PM +, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote: > Please read below, in addition to my questions, I note that with the new > setup my e-mail application no longer replies automatically to the list. I went looking at the mails before the change also had Reply-To: real

Why adding a prefix breaks DKIM signature (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

[ Adding discuss list back as I think this is of general interest ) On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:34:52PM +, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote: > Dear Sandro, > > I am not qualified to opine on the DKIM configuration, but I would question > the removal of the prefix. All other pipermail list I am

Re: Change in mailing list configuration

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Christian Willmes wrote: > As far as I understood it, the mailing list will continue to work as is in > the future? And discourse is only a mirror or an additional interface for > those who prefer to communicate via this app? This change has nothing to do

Re: Change in mailing list configuration

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:32:06PM +0100, Javier Jimenez Shaw wrote: > Hi Sandro > > It is surprising, but this is the first email from "discuss" that Gmail is > suggesting it could be spam. It says > > "Be careful with this message > The sender hasn't authenticated this message, so Gmail can't

Change in mailing list configuration

We've changed the configuration of this mailing list to respect the recomendations from the SysAdmin team: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/SAC:Mailing_Lists#Configuring_the_mailing_list Notable changes are: 1. No more [OSGeo-Discuss] prefix in email subjects 2. No more added footer 3.

[OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing list configuration change proposal

As part of a mailing list modernization effort the SysAdmin group has been recently evaluating improvements aimed at reducing email loss due to anti-spam measures and has come up with recommendation that are summarized here:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Sandro Santilli via Discuss wrote: > see if they are able to create a new thread by email, for example. Answering myself I was able to create new threads by email, just writing to @discourse.osgeo.org --s

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Anna Petrášová wrote: > Thank you, that's really helpful to know. I wonder if this "mailing list" > behavior could be set as a default for the migrated users. I also wonder if the "mailing list behaviour" is good enough, but this we can tell by testing

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 04:16:03PM +, Cannata Massimiliano via Discuss wrote: > it is a factual observation that there has been a sensible decline in the > engagement of people in OSGeo... > Not in the conferences presences but in the remote collaboration and > development... This is a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:46:24PM +0100, Markus Neteler via Discuss wrote: > > With an upgrade from mailman-2 to mailman-3 we could also have a > searchable archive. > See for example > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/ > which looks much more modern than mailman-2 on OSGeo.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Jorge Sanz via Discuss wrote: > Hi Vicky, allVicky, can you please confirm ... Just to point out one (only one) of the problems I mentioned in my previous email about using email over other systems: the mail from Jorge above arrived to me (and all other

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Bruce Bannerman via Discuss wrote: >Apart from these few emails telling me that a move to something called >Discourse is happening, I have not seen any discussion on our lists >explaining the pros and cons of such a move. >I find this lack

[OSGeo-Discuss] PostGIS-3.3.4 released

PostGIS 3.3.4 was just released. Details and download links can be found at: http://postgis.net/2023/07/PostGIS-3.3.4-Patch-Release/ Thanks, The PostGIS Development Team ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo AUTH compare to OSM

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:31:29AM +1100, Brad Hards via Discuss wrote: > Can you explain what you see as the organisational link between OSM and > OSGeo? > > I understand why you want to avoid FB for OSM, but not what you think OSGeo > (including the SAC) should do about it. One thing OSGeo

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra request

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:51:04AM +0100, Evrard Arthur via Discuss wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I would like to share a new QGIS plugin but I'm blocked at the "get >mantra" step... > >Can anyone give me some hint ? (email send yesterday to >mantra-requ...@osgeo.org but no

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mirroring Subversion repositories to Git

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:49:20PM +, Martin-Louis Bright wrote: > Thanks for the link to the Gitea site. I'm interested in the following > projects: > > https://svn.osgeo.org/mapguide/ > https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/ > https://svn.osgeo.org/metacrs/csmap/ suggest you ask on the mailing lists

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mirroring Subversion repositories to Git

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:31:23PM +, Martin-Louis Bright wrote: > Hi! > > Is there a Git mirror for the repositories hosted in Subversion at > https://svn.osgeo.org/? It would be great if these repositories were on > https://github.com/OSGeo. This is a decision left to each project. Which

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Projects] Status report for April - System Contract I 2020

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:56:21PM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Grafana is running on OSGeo3 monitor container -> https://monitor.osgeo.org > > Thanks, I eventually managed to start a dashboard so I could find osgeo3 > again quickly. Can you check if Dashboards can be shared with other users

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [SAC] wiki.osgeo.org has moved to osgeo7 from wiki.osgeo.osuosl.org VM

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 01:56:06AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > Just an FYI -- wiki.osgeo.org is completely on osgeo7 now (it's an image of > the old server, wiki.osgeo.osuosl.org converted to an lxd container) Thank you Regina, great work ! --strk;

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] How big is OSGeo?

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 03:07:06PM +0100, Jo Cook wrote: > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone has recently attempted to estimate the size > (in people) of OSGeo? Registered OSGeo Users (www.osgeo.org/osgeo_userid) at the moment are 21,744. You can see number of new registrations per year

[OSGeo-Discuss] librttopo 1.1.0 released

Version 1.1.0 of the RT Topology Libarry is ready for download: http://download.osgeo.org/librttopo/src/librttopo-1.1.0.tar.gz The RT Topology Library exposes an API to create and manage standard (ISO 13249 aka SQL/MM) topologies using user-provided data stores and released under the GNU GPL

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] PlanetOSGeo revamp

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:39:33PM +0100, Jorge Sanz wrote: > Please take a look and let me know if you see anything you'd like to > address: > > http://planet.osgeo.org/new_planet/ I like the way posts are short :) But I wanted to move past Feb 20 and didn't find a link to "show more" --strk;

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [SAC] Flickr FOSS4G and OSGeo photo history deadline Feb 5th

Jody wrote: > Q: Can we throw the images on OSGeo next cloud? On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote: > Yes – We have 16terabytes of space (of I think 8 TB is usable if it's in a > RAID config of some sort) How about using a more focused service for that ? MediaGobling

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: OSGeo Board nomination: Angelos Tzotsos

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:26:04PM +0200, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > Forwarding nomination of Angelos Tzotsos by Astrid Emde. The Board > Nominations page has been updated: > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Member_Nominations_2018 Seconding Angelos nomination. He's very active on welcoming new

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] okay foss4g time to move off of Flickr

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Manuel Grizonnet wrote: > if hosting the service ourselves is not an option there is also the solution > for OSGeo to pay 4.17$/month to Flickr to have unlimited storage: Hosting the service ourselves IS an option, we just need to provide some resources

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] PlanetOSGeo revamp

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:33:21PM +0100, Jorge Sanz wrote: > > https://planet.osgeo.org/new_planet/ It is weird that the "Read more..." link is at the top of the excerpt rather than below, can it be moved ? Is it possible to avoid embedded images ? Or the posts from gvSIG "International call

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Service Provider Directory down?

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 11:19:12AM -0600, James Klassen wrote: > On Feb 5, 2018 09:43, "Luí­s Moreira de Sousa" > wrote: > > what happened to the Service Provider Directory? The wiki is presently > > pointing to http://www.osgeo.org/search_profile , but that is a dead

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] PlanetOSGeo revamp

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:39:33PM +0100, Jorge Sanz wrote: > Please take a look and let me know if you see anything you'd like to > address: > > http://planet.osgeo.org/new_planet/ Thanks for taking this task ! One thing that I found annoying in the old planet and is still present in the new

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Website 15th relaunch - members and local chapters

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 09:16:32AM +, b.j.kob...@utwente.nl wrote: > Well, I created an OSGEO Userid, now let's hope it gets OKd ;-) > > By the way, on the creation page it states "OSGeo user IDs provide access to > many OSGeo services, including bug trackers and wikis. " You'd probably want

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Website 15th relaunch - members and local chapters

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:15:50AM -0800, Jody Garnett wrote: > I am not sure how getting access to the OSGeo wiki works, but all these > students have been doing it so I hope it is automated. There's an approval system in there as well, only different :( --strk;

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] registering at OSGeo

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +, Nagy Edmond wrote: > I've made a GRASS add-on and eventually hope to share it within the > community, and get feedback from users, but obtaining a user id is > a prerequisite. > > If anyone knows a good way of getting one, I would very much appreciate it.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Projects] [OSGeo-Live] Moving to Transifex - step 2 - Battle testing

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:05:05PM +0200, Nicolas Roelandt wrote: > Some of us also had worked on transifex for other FOSS projects, so we had > this knowledge to help us set up the whole process. Yep, that's the "drug trap" as I call it. It's the reason why Microsoft is "donating" licenses to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Projects] [OSGeo-Live] Moving to Transifex - step 2 - Battle testing

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:38:00AM +0200, Nicolas Roelandt wrote: > Transifex will hugely simplify and improve the sustainability of our > translation experience (over our previous manual spreadsheet / git / .rst > process). > > It offers machine translation. > It provides a review process. > It

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proprietary GIS on our OSGeo website

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:10:52PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Sandro mentionned GIMP's "like Photoshop, only better" motto but on > https://www.gimp.org/ no mention of Photoshop I could find They must have received a call from lawyers. But I'm sure I didn't dream that motto, or if I did, I was

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Add your avatar to wiki pages

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:42:48AM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Have some geek fun and magically add your avatar (from Gravatar/Libravatar > services) to your OSGeo wiki pages. The wiki syntax is: > > Actually this is even easier with the updated User template [1]: just

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Proprietary GIS on our OSGeo website

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:19:48PM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote: > The reason I want to keep the names (don't care about the links) is address > the needs of non-commuity website visitors. To answer the question "I use > XXX, how can you help me?" As I wrote on the ticket already, I like the idea

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Nomination Cristina Domínguez

+1 for Cristina --strk; On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:24:52PM -0400, Jorge Sanz wrote: > +1 Jorge > > Cristina is a super active member of our community in Seville > > -- > Jorge Sanz > > Sent from my phone, excuse my brevity. > > El 30 ago. 2017 20:06, "Vasile Craciunescu"

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Nominating Tom Chadwin for OSGeo Charter Membership

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Moritz Lennert wrote: > On 29/08/17 05:14, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > > Dear Moritz, > > > > According with the rules, Tom's nomination, as any other nomination, > > require at least one second vote. > > Then here's my second. :-) Here's mine for Tom

[OSGeo-Discuss] Nominating Björn Harrtell as an OSGeo charter member

I would like to nominate Björn Harrtell for OSGeo charter membership. Björn is a PostGIS committer, contributor of OpenLayers, GeoTools and JTS, author of the JavaScript JTS port (http://bjornharrtell.github.io/jsts/) He recently setup and still takes care of the experimental OSGeo/GitLab

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:53:47PM -0400, Marc Vloemans wrote: > GPL is approved by OSI, just like the EPL. We are on the same team. The word > 'against' suggests we are at odds with each other over this. Which we are > not, never have been and never will be. Do you accept GPL covered software

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects? This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is against GPL-licensed projects (like GRASS, QGIS, PostGIS) --strk; ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [FOSS4G EU 2017] Presentations on OSGeo's gogs

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:21:57PM +, Didier Richard wrote: > https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/foss4g-europe/foss4g-europe-2017-paris Wow, embedded PDFs, I'm loving it ! Thanks a lot for this --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org

[OSGeo-Discuss] [PHISHING] Important Notice To All Amazon Customers

FYI: a ticket has been created to address preventing these kind of phishing attacks: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1980#ticket ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding July Update

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:22:37PM -0500, Vicky Vergara wrote: > Hi Jody > Of course, but a lesson first so > I signed to the OSGeo Website code sprint in Boston, unfortunately I wont > be in person, but IRC (or if someone has skype to use video can make it > easier) Speaking of which, it

[OSGeo-Discuss] GEOS-3.6.2 released

Second patch release in the 3.6 branch has just been released: http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geos-3.6.2.tar.bz2 (1.9MB) MD5: a32142343c93d3bf151f73db3baa651f GIT commit: 4d2925d6e0c758742a178053132eef02cd8374d2 (tag 3.6.2) Bug fixes and improvements since previous release: - Fix

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] new official MapServer twitter account

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:51:28AM +0200, Jeff McKenna wrote: > The MapServer team here has created a new twitter account for updates from > the MapServer project: please share! https://twitter.com/mapserver_osgeo Please make sure MapServer team mebers are aware of open twitter alternatives, to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding May Update

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:10:39PM +0100, Steven Feldman wrote: > Puzzled > > We accept sponsorship from Google, we mentor students and are listed for > their Summer of Code but using a Google Form to easily collect data should be > avoided. > > Is it official OSGeo policy to not use Google

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding May Update

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:15:18AM +0100, Steven Feldman wrote: > An alternative is to make the score card as `Google Form and then embed that > in a page - that gives us a nice spreadsheet as the ‘back end’ without any > extra effort Please let's try to exist independently from Google :)

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:56:16PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote: > On 2017-03-21 12:19 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > > > > >RE: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo > > Yes the FOSS4G-Boston site is in OSGeo Gogs (at > https://git.osg

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > without a secret, there is no technology advancement I think this is a purely ideological position. Secrets can generate all kind of deseases, if you ask me :) --strk; ___ Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 21:02, Cameron Shorter wrote: > > I've added a line for OSGeo-Live > > FYI, I only walked through the ones in the "OSGeo Projects" frame at > osgeo.org. I think foss4g website (or

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Happy birthday to the community!

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 10:29:17AM -0400, Jeff McKenna wrote: > PS. As of 1st February we have 28672 unique subscribers to OSGeo lists! And 20601 OSGeo User IDs :) Happy birthday all --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planned Trac downtime Feb 1 8:30-9:30 UTC

channel (http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#osgeo) --strk; OSGeo System Administrators Team https://strk.kbt.io On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:02:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote: > Tomorrow morning we'll upgrade the OSGeo Trac service software > to the recently released versi

[OSGeo-Discuss] Planned Trac downtime Feb 1 8:30-9:30 UTC

Tomorrow morning we'll upgrade the OSGeo Trac service software to the recently released version 1.2. The upgrade process implies a period of downtime which in the best scenario will be of about 10 minutes, but could extend to more in case of troubles. The scheduled time on major world cities:

[OSGeo-Discuss] geos-3.6.1 released

A bugfix release of the Geometry Engine Open Source (GEOS) is ready for download: http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geos-3.6.1.tar.bz2 MD5: c97e338b3bc81f9848656e9d693ca6cc Changes: - Bug fixes / improvements - Fix GEOSSTRtree_nearest_r signature and add implementation (#796) - Fix

[OSGeo-Discuss] GEOS-3.5.1 released

Release 3.5.1 of GEOS is available: http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geos-3.5.1.tar.bz2 MD5: 2e3e1ccbd42fee9ec427106b65e43dc0 This is a bugfix release, containing these fixes/improvements: - Fix CMake configuration to allow build from released sources package (#753) - Fix memory

[OSGeo-Discuss] GEOS-3.6.0 released

Release 3.6.0 of GEOS is available: http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geos-3.6.0.tar.bz2 MD5: 55de5fdf075c608d2d7b9348179ee649 Changes since 3.5.0: - Important / Breaking Changes: - The PHP binding moved to its own repository: http://git.osgeo.org/gogs/geos/php-geos (#765) - New

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] https on 2017.foss4g.org

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:29:02AM +, Guido Stein wrote: > Sandro, > > can you please put a ticket into SAC for this. I will be happy to work with > them on this. Done: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1798 --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list

[OSGeo-Discuss] https on 2017.foss4g.org

Could the 2017.foss4g.org website be made available in https too ? Failing to do so results in browser warnings upon visiting a web page that contains the foss4g 2017 banner, like this: https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ It's gratis and easy (and worth learning) to do it via letsencrypt:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Candidate Statement for Jeffrey Johnson

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 08:59:05AM -0700, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Happy to answer any questions here or via other channels. Can we have > a hangout 'debate'? :) If you do, please use a free software alternative, not "hangout". Here's one: https://meet.jit.si/osgeo Or even better (requires less

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Nomination for Luigi Pirelli

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:16:04PM +0300, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > Forwarding Luigi Pirelli nomination by Yves Jacolin. +1 for Luigi --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Nomination for Matthias Kuhn

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:25:03PM +0300, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > Forwarding Matthias Kuhn nomination by Vincent Picavet. Seconded --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is website commettee alive ?

Hi Jody, thanks for getting back to me. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote: > I have joined the website committee / mailing list and they have been > responsive for updating the website. If you would like access I am sure you > can join the committee and volunteer?

[OSGeo-Discuss] Is website commettee alive ?

I've noticed a problem in a website page and filed a ticket for it: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1733 The ticket got no feedback in 4 weeks. The ticket content was also automatically sent to the WebCom mailing list: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/webcom/2016-June/002412.html This

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra for creating user id

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:01:18PM +0200, Pelle Rosenbeck Gøeg wrote: > I need the mantra for signing up at > https://www.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/ldap_create_user.py Please don't use this mailing list for similar requests. I've updated the user registration page to mention the sysadmin email address,

[OSGeo-Discuss] #osgeo- channels on freenode

As I noticed localized osgeo talk on Freenode happens on channels with hard-to-guess names (#gfoss for italian, #fossgis for german) I'm wondering what would it take to have "official" osgeo channels with format #osgeo-. I know Freenode does support a wildcard-like channel registration so that

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra Request (OSgeoID)

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 07:14:51PM +, Jason M Wheatley wrote: > I need a mantra so I can submit QGIS issues please! Thank you! For the record: Jason had already an account, I'm handling it with private communications. --strk; ___ Discuss mailing

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Adding "wiki" component to osgeo trac ?

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Christian Willmes wrote: > +1 > > Yes, sounds like a good Idea to give an opportunity for requesting > features and reporting bugs. Great. Component added and some tickets moved to it (for testing). I'm not sure you'll receive notifications, due to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra request (OsgeoID)

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Maybe the mantra should be posted to this list with a link to this > discussion. I'm quite sure that blocks most spam and removes a barrier to > reporting a bug/contributing. > > Now people have to register for the mailinglist,

[OSGeo-Discuss] Adding "wiki" component to osgeo trac ?

How about adding a "wiki" component to osgeo trac and give ownership to Christian ? Would you find that useful, Chris ? Theoretically you would be automatically assigned the tickets in that component. --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra request (OsgeoID)

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:29:05PM +0200, Frank Olieu wrote: > I need a mantra to create an OsgeoID. FYI: mantra sent via private email. --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] librttopo-1.0.0 released

Release 1.0.0 of librttopo is ready for download: http://download.osgeo.org/librttopo/src/librttopo-1.0.0.tar.gz (MD5 31b0c3fd80e92fc7a68ba16006aeba8b) This is the first public release of the library. The RT Topology Library exposes an API to create and manage standard (ISO 13249 aka SQL/MM)

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mantra request

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Alessandro Isastia wrote: > I need a mantra to report a bug in nViz in Grass latest release. FYI: I've sent Alessandro a private mail with the mantra --strk; ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Userid registration - Full Name and Surname ?

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:47:53AM -0700, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > Strk, > > It was a direct transcription of the fields in LDAP. No harm in > changing it I imagine. Any idea about the "givenName" field, which is present in some LDAP records but isn't prompted for in the form ? It's hard to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Userid registration - Full Name and Surname ?

It looks like being a common issue: https://github.com/nijel/weblate/issues/812 How about just dropping one of the fields ? --strk; On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > I'm wondering why do we ask for "Full Name" and "Surname" > in the

[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Userid registration - Full Name and Surname ?

I'm wondering why do we ask for "Full Name" and "Surname" in the user registration form. I find it confusing, and a quick look at the LDAP database shows it's not just me: about half the registered users put the "given name" in the "Full Name" field. Some users also have a registered "givenName"

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Recovering OSGeo account password

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:31:32AM -0700, Zan Strausz wrote: > Not sure who to contact to help with recovering access to my > account, there seems to be no password recovery enabled in the login > page. Got this list address from account registration page >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [SoC] OSGeo user id

Hi Mayank, On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:12:08PM +0530, Mayank Agrawal wrote: > I am Mayank Agrawal and I am participating in the GSoC this year with > Grass. For creating a wiki in https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC#a2016 > , I need a OSGeo userid but this link >

[OSGeo-Discuss] [trac service] inter-trac links enabled

For those projects that are still using the OSGeo trac, I've just enabled inter-trac links. This means you can reference tickets/wikipages/changesets of any OSGeo project using trac from any other trac instance by simply prepending the project name in the link, like: geos:changeset:2234

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo

Marc, I hadn't seen librttopo added to the wiki page, is there anything I should do to move this further ? --strk; On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:38:36AM +0200, Marc Vloemans wrote: > > > @Sandro: which site do you wan

[OSGeo-Discuss] Trac Spam filter plugin installed

I've installed TracSpamPlugin globally and prepared every instance so that project trac admins can enable the plugin autonomously (required a database structure upgrade for spam management tables). See https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter for usage instructions. --strk;

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Somebody is Spamming trac_osgeo4w list

Quick and temporary "fix" for list admins: put trac_osge...@osgeo.org in moderation Quick and temporary "fix" for trac admins: disable trac creation permission to "authenticated" users. --strk; On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:00:14PM -0400, Alex M wrote: > Ya we're working on it, it's actually trac

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:38:36AM +0200, Marc Vloemans wrote: > @Sandro: which site do you want me to link to? There's currently no official website. Maybe the closest to that is: https://strk.kbt.io/projects/rttopo but if you can help with building a real website (as mentioned on the wiki

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:00:04PM -0400, Jody Garnett wrote: > I would ask if the project would consider joining OSGeo as a community > project ? This > requirement is minimal, we want some assurance that your project is both > open source and

[OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo

Hi all, this mail is to request permission to use the download area of OSGeo for publishing librttopo packages, and possibly an rttopo.osgeo.org domain and webspace. The librttopo project consists of a GPL(v2+) licensed library providing a standard-based topology API on top of user-provided

[OSGeo-Discuss] Requirements for an OSGeo Git service

Following recent experiment toward the provision of an OSGeo Git service, I've drafted a page to gather requirements from projects developers: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GitServiceRequirement If you're interested in such a service, please add your name under an existing requirement line

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] where to find logos of OSGeo ?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:07:38PM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > El Martes 19. abril 2016 13.06.36 Sandro Santilli escribió: > > Is there a page listing all available logos of OSGeo ? > > I could not find such a page, so reverted to extract logos > > from existing pages

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 15 April 2016 at 09:52, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > > What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ? > > My 10 features are: > > 1. LDAP (log in with OSGeo User ID or OpenID) &g

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:15:34PM +, Jody Garnett wrote: > I think some kind of bridge to github is high on the list (viewing it more > as an outreach marketing concern than anything). In my experience projects > that are not officially on github get lots of unofficial forks - but that >

[OSGeo-Discuss] What would you want from an OSGeo Git Service ?

Following the "recent" discussion [1] about OSGeo infrastructure to provide modern software code management services, I drafted a features comparison table [2] on the wiki to help with determining which packages would better serve the needs of OSGeo projects. If you have any specific feature

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2016 OSGeo's actions - Survey

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:41:02PM +0200, Massimiliano Cannata wrote: > For this reason, the board kindly ask you to participate in the survey by > filling (as many time as your ideas are) the form at this url: > http://goo.gl/forms/HTGTlKv7SB (When) will we get to read the results of the survey

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WorldWind GeoForAll @ OSGeo+ICA+ISPRS+OGRS

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 07:04:05PM +, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > 1. The European Space Agency (ESA) has standardized on NASA WebWorldWind. Great news, thank you ! I took the chance to register a NASAWorldWind organization on the _experimental_ OSGeo git service, and added mirrors of

[OSGeo-Discuss] A new candidate to renew OSGeo code hosting solution (was OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it)

Sorry to revive this old thread but there's something new On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > I'd rather avoid to use a software that's intentionally limited in its > free software version. We still want all OSGeo users (how much users > exist by now?) abl

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

7:17 AM Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > > > On 8 March 2016 at 12:19, Oliver Courtin <olivier.cour...@oslandia.com> > > wrote: > > > Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:34, Sandro Santilli a écrit : > > >> > > >> Donating some fun to core

  1   2   >