The website committee has been dissolved, making this a more self-servce
experience.
All committee chairs (and foundation officers) should now how website edit
access; if we missed anyone please comment on
https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1789
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 08:20,
I would tend to think of GeoForAll/Geo4All/geo4all, osgeo-live, etc... as
"Initiatives" rather than software projects.
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 08:20, Massimiliano Cannata <
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote:
> dear Board,
> in the OSGeo landing page (www.osgeo.org) in the
On Friday 21 October 2016 12:41:56 Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 10/20/2016 10:53 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> > OSGeo-Live likewise has hundreds of contributors, provides a easy way
> > for new users to find out about Open Source projects, and maintains a
> > high level of quality. It
Hi all,
On 10/20/2016 10:53 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
OSGeo-Live likewise has hundreds of contributors, provides a easy way
for new users to find out about Open Source projects, and maintains a
high level of quality. It should be promoted. Note, we have considered
taking OSGeo-Live
Dear Venka,
Good idea! I will gladly start setting the wiki page within the next days.
Cheers,
Codrina
On 21/10/16 12:07, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
Hi Codrina,
On 2016/10/21 17:09, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT
Hi all,
I also think this is an excellent idea, and I like the proposed name too.
I would be happy to contribute to such an initiative too.
Best,
Angelos
On 10/21/2016 11:09 AM, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
Hi Codrina,
On 2016/10/21 17:09, Codrina Maria Ilie wrote:
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
other Open Data communities, as well.
That's great! Shall we start with setting up a wiki page and
inviting others to join the Data4All
On 21/10/16 08:33, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
> To me using PROJECT for outreach activities is misleading and confusing.
That may actually just be a matter of language. Certainly rules relating
to the development of software products do not apply to the development
of open source data or the
Dear Venka, all
I would gladly join forces in a Data4All initiative with OSM, HOT and
other Open Data communities, as well.
Cheers,
Codrina
On 21/10/16 02:27, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
Regarding "Public Geodata Project", I expressed my views in
the recent e-mail [2]. I would be happy to
I strongly disagree in using the name "project" for outreach "activities".
In OSGeo a project is a "software project" and we have:
- osgeo projects (graduated)
- incubating projects (incubating)
- community projects (not big enough to incubate)
Then we have "outreach activities" which are
Maxi, Cameron and all,
Perhaps the term "Education Committee" could be replaced with
Geo4All as it represents the educational outreach project of
OSGeo.
Mapbuilder which is listed as an Foundation project has
retired [1] and and can be removed or shown
"Past Project".
Regarding "Public Geodata
Hi Maxi,
I'm not sure our software incubation checklist is the correct criteria
to apply to "OSGeo Outreach Projects".
--
The education committee is a huge success story of OSGeo, attracting
educators from around the world who are promoting Open Source to future
generations. OSGeo should
12 matches
Mail list logo
