On 09/08/2012 04:38 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Andrew, I'm moving this conversation over to OSGeo Discuss list so
that it has the opportunity for wider discussion.
Thank you Cameron. And hello everyone.
Extracting from a conversation on the board email list ...
On 09/09/12 00:25, Andrew Ross
Andrew,
I suggest that the next steps would be to do a gap analysis between
OSGeo incubation processes and LT incubation processes.
This gap analysis will likely lead to:
* Merging of both OSGeo and LT processes to pick up the best points of
each.
* Identification of the differences, followed
Hi Cameron, Michael, All
Yes that makes good sense, will likely yield tangible benefits. I'm in.
I note that Jody Garnett is chair of the incubation Committee and also
on the Project Management Committee (PMC) @ LocationTech. (added to /cc)
Andrew
On 09/10/2012 04:26 PM, Cameron Shorter
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Cameron Shorter
cameron.shor...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew, I'd like to suggest extending your thought to suggest that
projects can be members of OSGeo AND LocationTech rather than OSGeo
OR LocationTech. Any reason why that wouldn't work?
Any organisation that
Andrew, I'm moving this conversation over to OSGeo Discuss list so that
it has the opportunity for wider discussion.
Extracting from a conversation on the board email list ...
On 09/09/12 00:25, Andrew Ross wrote:
If there is a close relationship between OSGeo LocationTech, say
where there
