Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-11-05 Thread Jachym Cepicky
Vasile - good work, thanks for it, you did great. J po 30. 10. 2017 v 18:32 odesílatel Jody Garnett napsal: > I think the correct link is this one - > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2016-8-24#OSGeo_charter_member_election_procedure > . > > But I agree,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
I think the correct link is this one - https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2016-8-24#OSGeo_charter_member_election_procedure . But I agree, although this issue was discussed across several meetings (notably the issues and stratagy discussed here

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-30 Thread Vasile Craciunescu
Hi Bart, I think I had something like 10-12 interactions on this subject. But is not that number but the fact that most of the people I discuss with had previous discussions in the local/project community they belong and that this critics have a larger number of supporters. Best, Vasile On

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-30 Thread Vasile Craciunescu
Dear Tom, I understand the way you are feeling and I know that are reasons for that. I remember that I had some hard time when I did wrote that part of my email. However, this was reported my many persons and I had to include this in my message. Anyway, I don't think that a single old OSGeo

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-30 Thread Bart van den Eijnden
Very good point Tom. The only public complaint I've seen about the new process was in this board meeting by Jeff: http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeo/%23osgeo.2017-10-05.log [1] Vasile, can you maybe shed some light on how many people actually complained about it? Personally I don't think

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Chadwin
Dear Vasile and all I've thought long and hard about whether to reply or not, but it has been bothering me, so I guess I must. > However, during the nomination > period, many of our members considered the new membership process way > too inclusive/lite, causing a diminution in the importance of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-26 Thread Luigi Pirelli
great CRO management Vasile, I feel guaranteed by you. tnx Luigi Pirelli ** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli

[OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-25 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky
[forwarding it to OSGeo discuss]  Vasile, thanks a lot for your hard work as CRO and considerations to keep the _community_ in balance! Kind regards Helmut OSGeo charter member >Dear Board directors and dear members of OSGeo community, > >This year elections [1] will end in less than 7 hours

[OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 from the CRO point of view

2017-10-25 Thread Vasile Craciunescu
Dear Board directors and dear members of OSGeo community, This year elections [1] will end in less than 7 hours and it is time for me, as CRO, to make a short assessment and to issue a few recommendations. As you all know, during the process we had a few situations that caused tension and