+1 to Frank's summary,
D.
On 03-08-15 22:04, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I have filled the survey matching my answers ad close to my views as
possible but I also give +1 to agree with Frank's comments
3 sie 2015 18:39 Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com
mailto:warmer...@pobox.com napisał(a):
Dear Bruce, Steve, Even, Peter, Dan and others,
Sorry for replying so late. I'm in vacation with limited Internet
access. Personally, I agree with many of your points. However, as Steven
already pointed out, we had a few days of open discussions on the survey
before sending to our Charter
I have been involved in the MapServer and GeoMoose projects since before
OSGeo existed. I remember the founding of OSGeo and the heated
discussions that took place to define the direction OSGeo would take.
The future of OSGeo and how it interacts with its members is very
important to me.
Count me has one who has awoken. The survey has spawned an interesting
discussion. I hope to see the results shared at some point, even if not
everyone has participated. Maybe a threshold of charter member
participation should be met before the results are shared? This of course
would just be for
Folks,
For what it's worth, I also do not feel comfortable with completing
the survey as it is currently structured as the structure forces me to
give answers that don't really represent my views.
For what it's worth I am in favor of:
- a modest number of charter members using something like
+1 Frank's statement is exactly what I would like to see also.
-Steve
On 8/3/2015 12:39 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
For what it's worth, I also do not feel comfortable with completing
the survey as it is currently structured as the structure forces me to
give answers that don't really
+1 Frank's statement is exactly what I would like to see also.
Edwin
On 8/3/15, Stephen Woodbridge wood...@swoodbridge.com wrote:
+1 Frank's statement is exactly what I would like to see also.
-Steve
On 8/3/2015 12:39 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
For what it's worth, I also do not
+1 Frank's statement
It is a great summary and I also want to compliment OSGeo on maintaining
diversity in Board and Officers both in country of origin and companies
people work for in all these years, it is an organization I am proud to be
a humble little part of.
If there is something that I
I have filled the survey matching my answers ad close to my views as
possible but I also give +1 to agree with Frank's comments
3 sie 2015 18:39 Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com napisał(a):
Folks,
For what it's worth, I also do not feel comfortable with completing
the survey as it is
Hi Vassile,
This survey appears to be flawed.
I applaud your efforts to bring this issue to a head, but I'm not convinced
that we'll get valid results from the survey.
In my case:
I believe that there should be open membership for any interested, perhaps
with a membership fee.
I also see the
I think Bruce has put some of my concerns about the questions into good
examples the resonate with my concerns.
For example: I am a long time contributor to multiple OSGeo projects and
have mentored some smaller projects that are not OSGeo projects yet but
are key pieces of GIS
I'd love to see OSGeo evolve into a professional organization not entirely
unlike ASME, ASCE, IEEE, etc. These organizations charge nominal membership
dues usually at different levels depending on the person's status
(professional, student, developing country, etc.). All regular members can
vote
12 matches
Mail list logo
