I believe the test should be:
Is this a local issue? If so, it should be handled at a local level, by the
local chapter.
Is this a global issue? Something that is applicable to all local chapters,
and that most local chapters are likely to believe in? If so, then the
glocal OSGeo should make a
Hi Maria et al,
That sounds eminently sensible to me. I guess it's already an agenda
item for the next board meeting so the rest of us can wait to see what
comes out of that.
All the best
Jo
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:14 PM María Arias de Reyna wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we can do both.
>
> I
Hi,
I think we can do both.
I mean: OSGeo should sign it (from my perspective) because it is
saying the same thing we say all the time: FLOSS is better :)
And at the same time, we can use the European Chapter to talk to the
FSF(E) if this is an european initiative to lobby and if we can join
Hi All,
Do we think this is something OSGeo should sign globally, or that
individual chapters should decide to sign or not, as appropriate? I'm
all for OSGeo signing it, as it's bigger (obviously) and would
hopefully have more of an impact, but I guess others may have a
different opinion...
Jo
Hi Jody,
thank you, just added to the agenda. Indeed I think this aims at being a
global initiative rather than limited to Europe only. I have seen
signatures from countries all over the world, as well as support from
international organizations based outside Europe. I think that OSGeo
should
Dear members of the OSGeo community,
I haven't seen this circulating already in our mailing list, if I just
missed it, apologies.
This is to draw your attention to the following campaign:
https://publiccode.eu/
I really would like to see OSGeo among the supporters of the open letter.
Like-minded
