-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 22/09/2013 10:35, Tamas Szekeres ha scritto:
I'd suggest Mateusz an Jeff should also be invited (if they have
time). Any other who is involved in packaging Windows stuff, please
feel free to check in as well.
I personally would welcome any
On 2013-09-22 00:35, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
And so on (anyone is welcomed to add further experiences or
ideas)
Hi all.
I agree with Tamas: we first have an issue with governance; once this
is solved, we can deal with tech issues.
Anyone a suggestion to move forward? To me, the first
2013/9/22 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
I agree with Tamas: we first have an issue with governance; once this is
solved, we can deal with tech issues.
Anyone a suggestion to move forward? To me, the first candidates that come
to mind are Frank, Tamas, and Juergen: anyone else?
Alex,
thanks a lot for such kind of answer.
In fact what I have in mind is more to provide a build suite, I definitely
don't know how to name it.
Anyway, let say something that make you able to download this or that software
and which will make sure that you will get everything required to
Gerald,
There are so many decisions that should be made regarding to either the
suggested directions to follow, or the technical details, which might apply
for a PSC indeed.
You've meant to prepare something for the developers (something like what
I've indended to do with the binaries at
On 21 September 2013 23:35, Tamas Szekeres szeker...@gmail.com wrote:
And so on (anyone is welcomed to add further experiences or ideas)
I think it may be worth to remind about CoApp:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2013-April/002168.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot,
Dear all,
Despite I agree with you that providing the OSGeo softwares in a binary
distribution is a good idea, what do you think of providing something, which
may be IMO even better to the end users / developpers, let's call it a build
kit or a build environment already correctly setup for
On 2013/09/20 16:39, Alex Mandel wrote:
Unlike OSGeoLive we can't supply VMs as that takes paid licenses for
the software in question.
Alex - could you please clarify what you mean by this statement.
Thanks
--
Dave Patton
Victoria, B.C.
Degree Confluence Project:
Canadian Coordinator
On 09/20/2013 05:33 PM, Dave Patton wrote:
On 2013/09/20 16:39, Alex Mandel wrote:
Unlike OSGeoLive we can't supply VMs as that takes paid licenses for
the software in question.
Alex - could you please clarify what you mean by this statement.
Thanks
We can't give out Windows Virtual
On 2013-09-21 03:01, Alex Mandel wrote:
We can't give out Windows Virtual Machine(VM) images with Visual
Studio
I think standalone binaries are really the only way to go for the
average Win user.
Thanks for your thoughts.
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at
If you can come up with a way to do it on Windows I think many people
are listening. The nature of Windows and Visual Studio tends to be what
gets in the way of a more package management style system or build
environment that's easy to replicate. I see no reason there can't be a
shortcut in
11 matches
Mail list logo
