Frank,
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that OSGeo have any policy for project
contributors other than that they identify contributors identified
by the
project PSCs. If a project PSC does not choose to identify any
contributors
then no one
Frank Warmerdam schrieb:
[snap]
1) Does it seem acceptable to give preferential listing (via order of
returned results) to organizations identified as contributors?
It is not only accepable, it is preferable.
2) Are project PSCs actually willing and interested in identifying
contributors
i
>Frank Wrote:
2) Are project PSCs actually willing and interested in identifying
contributors
in a formal way? It would be up to projects to decide what criteria
they want
and to notify webcom of their contributors in some fashion.
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
I think a PSC should establish a poli
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
I think a PSC should establish a policy for their own project and
possibly provide such listing on their own project website in the
first place. This could be liberal for some, more conservative for
others. OSGeo should follow the projects policy if it exists.
That gives
Hi Frank,
On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
However, being listed in the service provider directory would still
be free
and we would not otherwise discriminate against service providers
who have
not been identified as contributors.
Yes
This email is seeking feedback from
