Frank Warmerdam wrote:
For now I'm mainly watching with interest - especially I'm looking forward
to seeing what some real lawyers at the Software Freedom Law Center have to
say about the topic.
Maybe "some real lawyers" could do
some presentations at FOSS4G2007?
--
Dave Patton
Canadian Coor
Allan Doyle wrote:
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, it's a topic that has renewed
relevance.
From the sound of it, OSGeo itself has too many eggs in its basket to
risk having them broken by providing a shield.
Allan,
Well, this is a concern at least. I still think OSGeo *might*
Yes. Thanks, Frank. I love the idea of Eben Moglen defending my software.
Sean
Allan Doyle wrote:
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, it's a topic that has renewed
relevance.
From the sound of it, OSGeo itself has too many eggs in its basket to
risk having them broken by providing a
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, it's a topic that has
renewed relevance.
From the sound of it, OSGeo itself has too many eggs in its basket
to risk having them broken by providing a shield. But that ought not
stop geo-foss developers from either joining up with Bruce's idea or
Folks,
Bruce Perens is a luminary in the open source world, and known as a
founder of the Debian project, and author of the Free Software
Definition - a foundational document for the concept of OSI approved
open source licenses.
Bruce Perens wrote:
> A long time ago we planned for SPI to protec
