Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread P Kishor
If the response had been enthusiastic then perhaps your help wouldn't have been needed. That you think the response was mixed/tepid and that it could have been better is perfect reason for you to jump in and take leadership here. I seriously can't think of a better, ahem, response and suggestion

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Moules Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:14 AM To: Even Rouault Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go Hi Even, I'm not averse to the notion, but given the mixed/tepid response to this email thread, it doesn't

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Even, I'm not averse to the notion, but given the mixed/tepid response to this email thread, it doesn't seem like something the community has any particular desire for. Cheers, Jonathan On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:18:32 + Even Rouaulteven.roua...@spatialys.com wrote

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:32:54PM +, Jody Garnett wrote: > I second the idea of build boxes being very important to the well being of > projects. I was not aware that OSGeo had been running one, or that it had > been taken away. It was set up by Mateusz, did run wonderfully and got later

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Even Rouault
Jonathan, if you feel OSGeo should have an environmental policy, you could certainly propose one for consideration by the larger community, and then volunteer to champion to make it adopted, and enforce it afterwards. Even > > > On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 + Daniel >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 + Daniel Morissettedmorisse...@mapgears.com wrote On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote: Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at least 10 transatlantic flights and

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
I second the idea of build boxes being very important to the well being of projects. I was not aware that OSGeo had been running one, or that it had been taken away. I assume you have looked at solutions like Travis which are "free" to open source (in exchange for the advertising they get by

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 8 March 2016 at 12:19, Oliver Courtin wrote: > Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:34, Sandro Santilli a écrit : >> >> Donating some fun to core developers is surely appreciated [..] >> but is just to stress out that it doesn't >> take being in the same room at the same time to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote: Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at least 10 transatlantic flights and probably at least that many short-haul (pan-Europe) flights too (which have higher emissions profiles per passenger mile). I don't doubt a lot of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Oliver, I can certainly see how meeting would help communities; as you say, that's how humans work. But what about the even bigger (global) community? Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at least 10 transatlantic flights and probably at least that many short-haul

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:03:31PM +, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > A truly exemplary individual effort for all sprinters, > for how great work well precedes the sprint itself, > allowing Paul to make the most of this coding event. It might be of interest that the bug which kept Paul

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the paris code sprint go

2016-03-07 Thread Howard Butler
And mine http://howardbutler.com/pdal-paris-sprint-recap.html > On Mar 7, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > Here's mine > > http://blog.cleverelephant.ca/2016/03/paris-code-sprint-postgis-recap.html > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jody Garnett

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-07 Thread Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
to make the most of this coding event. Go! Paul! Go! -Patrick -Original Message- From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 10:07 AM To: Jody Garnett Cc: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the paris code sprint go

2016-03-07 Thread Paul Ramsey
Here's mine http://blog.cleverelephant.ca/2016/03/paris-code-sprint-postgis-recap.html On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Taking this out to a seperate email thread - several projects had a plan > going in, how did it go? > > PostGIS Agenda > SFCGAL

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the paris code sprint go

2016-03-06 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 06 mars 2016 20:59:16, Jody Garnett a écrit : > Taking this out to a seperate email thread - several projects had a plan > going in, how did it go? > >- PostGIS Agenda > >- SFCGAL Agenda >

[OSGeo-Discuss] how did the paris code sprint go

2016-03-06 Thread Jody Garnett
Taking this out to a seperate email thread - several projects had a plan going in, how did it go? - PostGIS Agenda - SFCGAL Agenda - OTB